Cabled observing stations for remote locations
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Using experience and technologies developed for Ocean Networks Canada's (ONC) seafloor cabled networks we have developed a small scale observing station that can be easily deployed in remote locations such as Canada's high Arctic. These areas provide challenges in a number of areas; environmental, logistic and social. In this paper we will discuss how these challenges are met and some strategies that we use to help ensure successful deployments of these stations. The engineering of these projects required new technology to be developed to deal with the different environments. In some respects things are easier, the platforms currently deployed and planned for future deployment are all in shallow water and in seismically quiet zones. However, the remote location and extreme weather conditions in the Arctic provide new challenges. There are three main components to these system: the underwater platform connecting all the instruments to the relay station on shore that includes a weather station and camera and transmits all the data to the shore station that buffers and forwards data to a data centre. The main challenge for the underwater component is to ensure that the ice does not interfere with the systems. The land-based relay tower uses wireless networking components that are vulnerable to environmental damage and vandalism. The final transmission of data from the shore station to the data centre is done through a commercial satellite-based channel that is also subject to weather and other environmental challenges, has relatively low bandwidth and is not 100% reliable. The remote observing stations were designed to be relatively small and lightweight so that one or two people can easily deploy and recover the main sensor tripod using only a small boat and a diver. The major engineering obstacles for the arctic deployment were the extreme low temperatures experienced during the winter months and the formation (and especially the subsequent break-up) of surface sea-ice. The relay station is perhaps the most vulnerable link in the whole system. Data are generally not buffered before reaching the shore station so any failure of the system prior to that will result in data loss. The relay component is located beside the water and is more exposed to the elements. Once the data reach the shore station, servers buffer the data. Buffering protects data against network outages and allows large data sets such as video data to be sent later at a reduced bandwidth. Logistics requires careful planning as only limited supplies are available on site. Keeping the platforms relatively small not only reduces the overall cost of deployment and general maintenance but also allows for a greater amount of community involvement and personal interaction. Involving the community in the project significantly increases chances of success. To date Ocean Networks Canada has deployed two observing stations, one at Brentwood College School (BCS) near Victoria, BC and one in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, in Canada's high Arctic. The first installation, BCS, was a proof of concept and served as a test for the second installation in a remote location. More installations are being planned and refinements are in the works to improve the system. Using copper cable for data transmission limits the length of cable that can be used, this limit can be greatly extended by using fibre optic cables for data transmission. ONC has also designed new underwater interface cans to connect instruments to shore. These new devices will have the ability to support more instruments and provide better monitoring and control. They also allow greater flexibility in the variety of instruments that can be connected to the observing stations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle