MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1599068253

Bridging Disciplines Through Service-learning

2007· article· en· W1599068253 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Elaine T. Jurkowski, Charla J. Lautar

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic exchange quarterly · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueService-Learning and Community Engagement
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésService-learningGeneral partnershipMultidisciplinary approachScholarshipService (business)CurriculumSociologyDisciplineEngineering ethicsPublic relationsPsychologyPedagogyMedical educationMedicineEngineeringPolitical scienceBusinessSocial science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract One of the goals of service-learning is to serve the needs of the community. Before this can be accomplished, roles of the various individuals involved in the partnership must be established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in perceptions of oral and general health issues between dental hygiene and social work students in order bridge disciplines through multidisciplinary collaboration through service-learning. Curriculum development is necessary to ensure professional groups have awareness of the skills and contributions each can provide. Introduction Multi-disciplinary collaboration is increasingly important dimension of the helping process for professionals working within health and human arenas. A critical component of this preparation process is to encourage the development of multi-disciplinary partnerships through service-learning approaches. One of the goals of service-learning is to serve the needs of the community. Before this can be accomplished, roles of the various individuals involved in the partnership must be established and understood through contact and collaborative activities. To date, a limited amount of research has been conducted to understand how service-learning activities bridge disciplines to collaborate, builds understanding of other's professional perspectives, and prepares students for multidisciplinary collaboration. Service-learning has been adopted by many campuses associated with higher education within the United States and Canada. The definition of service-learning carries different connotations depending upon the setting. For example, early definition of service-learning has been defined by Boyer (1994) as an approach to teaching, learning, and that not only celebrates the scholarship of discovering knowledge, but also celebrates the scholarship of integrating knowledge, and applying knowledge through professional service (p. A48). One of the earliest approaches to learning was conceptualized by John Dewey (Boydston,1977), who conceptually moved away form the paradigm of related to volunteerism and charity to the role of as a responsibility of the individual toward democratic citizenship. Dewey sought to link the concepts of education/human learning with community and democratic participation (Taylor, 2002). Eyler & Giles (1999) suggests that service-learning is a method by which students improve their academic learning and develop personal skills through structured projects. In turn, these projects meet community needs, and build upon students' activities by providing these students with opportunities to learn through reflecting upon their experiences. Service-learning is distinguished from volunteerism by the nature of its reciprocal relationship. Students not only provide to the community, but also receive a benefit from their involvement, while volunteerism relies solely on the recipient as the primary beneficiary (Furco, 1996a). Service-learning is also distinguished from internships because internships are intended to provide the student with hands on experience that will enhance the students' skills and knowledge, and the student is clearly the beneficiary (Furco, 1996b). The distinctions among Dewey's early teachings, volunteerism, internships and service-learning are important to discern because of the historical roots found within the helping professions. For example, many human professionals such as nurses, teachers and social workers evolved from charitable works and voluntary efforts. Volunteerism was initially the basis of activity for many human professionals, while internships have been traditionally used in order to ensure that the skills and competencies of professional training were developed. Internships have also been used historically as a vehicle to contribute to the workforce. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,606
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,311 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic exchange quarterlyMême sujetService-Learning and Community EngagementTravaux en français237 207