Bridging Disciplines Through Service-learning
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract One of the goals of service-learning is to serve the needs of the community. Before this can be accomplished, roles of the various individuals involved in the partnership must be established. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in perceptions of oral and general health issues between dental hygiene and social work students in order bridge disciplines through multidisciplinary collaboration through service-learning. Curriculum development is necessary to ensure professional groups have awareness of the skills and contributions each can provide. Introduction Multi-disciplinary collaboration is increasingly important dimension of the helping process for professionals working within health and human arenas. A critical component of this preparation process is to encourage the development of multi-disciplinary partnerships through service-learning approaches. One of the goals of service-learning is to serve the needs of the community. Before this can be accomplished, roles of the various individuals involved in the partnership must be established and understood through contact and collaborative activities. To date, a limited amount of research has been conducted to understand how service-learning activities bridge disciplines to collaborate, builds understanding of other's professional perspectives, and prepares students for multidisciplinary collaboration. Service-learning has been adopted by many campuses associated with higher education within the United States and Canada. The definition of service-learning carries different connotations depending upon the setting. For example, early definition of service-learning has been defined by Boyer (1994) as an approach to teaching, learning, and that not only celebrates the scholarship of discovering knowledge, but also celebrates the scholarship of integrating knowledge, and applying knowledge through professional service (p. A48). One of the earliest approaches to learning was conceptualized by John Dewey (Boydston,1977), who conceptually moved away form the paradigm of related to volunteerism and charity to the role of as a responsibility of the individual toward democratic citizenship. Dewey sought to link the concepts of education/human learning with community and democratic participation (Taylor, 2002). Eyler & Giles (1999) suggests that service-learning is a method by which students improve their academic learning and develop personal skills through structured projects. In turn, these projects meet community needs, and build upon students' activities by providing these students with opportunities to learn through reflecting upon their experiences. Service-learning is distinguished from volunteerism by the nature of its reciprocal relationship. Students not only provide to the community, but also receive a benefit from their involvement, while volunteerism relies solely on the recipient as the primary beneficiary (Furco, 1996a). Service-learning is also distinguished from internships because internships are intended to provide the student with hands on experience that will enhance the students' skills and knowledge, and the student is clearly the beneficiary (Furco, 1996b). The distinctions among Dewey's early teachings, volunteerism, internships and service-learning are important to discern because of the historical roots found within the helping professions. For example, many human professionals such as nurses, teachers and social workers evolved from charitable works and voluntary efforts. Volunteerism was initially the basis of activity for many human professionals, while internships have been traditionally used in order to ensure that the skills and competencies of professional training were developed. Internships have also been used historically as a vehicle to contribute to the workforce. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».