MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1599284240

The Bell Savage Inn and Playhouse in London

2006· article· en· W1599284240 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Herbert Berry

Notice bibliographique

RevueMedieval & Renaissance drama in England · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGlobeArtnobodyQuarter (Canadian coin)Art historyHistoryArchaeologyBiology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FOUR London inns were also playhouses in Shakespearean times, and notable theatrical events occurred in all of them. All four together, however, are less well known than any of the nineteen other Shakespearean playhouses. Unsurprisingly, they are barely mentioned in many studies of the Shakespearean stage. Of, for example, the 139 pages that E. K. Chambers devoted to specific playhouses in the second volume of his Elizabethan Stage, these four playhouses occupy only three and a quarter pages. Yet three were playhouses for nearly twenty years, longer than ten of the others, including some very famous places like the Rose, first Globe, and St. Paul's. The fourth could have been a playhouse for thirty years, longer also than the Theatre, both Fortunes, and the second Globe-and if it was not the first Shakespearean playhouse, it was probably the second. In a sense, another of the four was the last.1 Nobody has known anything about, for example, their ownership and management and the places in them where performances took place.2 Moreover, what has been known defies some conventional ideas about Shakespearean playhouses. They were public playhouses in the City of London, three of them actually within the walls. The other public playhouses were in suburbs to escape the attentions of City authorities who disapproved of such things. Unlike the other public playhouses, too, they belonged to commercial enterprises that otherwise had nothing to do with entertainments. The inns, that is, were regular inns long before, while, and long after the playhouses existed in them. All are supposed to have given up their business as playhouses in about 1596. Two later public playhouses (the Boar's Head and Red Bull) were in inns, too, but those places had ceased permanently to do business as inns before they became playhouses. Three of the four places that were also active inns were the Bull in Bishopsgate Street, the Cross Keys in Gracechurch Street, and the Bell, which adjoined the Cross Keys in the same street. The fourth was the the main subject of this essay. It was the north side of Fleet Street about 100 yards outside the City wall at Ludgate. That end of Fleet Street was then sometimes and is now always called Ludgate HiU. The was in the City ward of Farringdon Without and the parish of St. Bride. Most of the site of the playhouse is now a garden-cum-parking lot behind No. 50 Ludgate Hill. Even the spelling of the name of the place is a problem. Chambers in his Elizabethan Stage, Bentley in his Jacobean and Caroline Stage (Oxford, 1968), and others (including me) have spelled the name Bel Savage, having noted, presumably, that an entry about Richard Tarlton in the Stationers' Register spelled it so (2 August 1589) and Stephen Gosson and William Prynne spelled it nearly so, Belsauage and Belsavage (1579, 1633). In documents mentioned below, the author of Maroccus Extaticus also spelled it Belsauage in 1595. Others, however, wrote bell alias le bell (1555), the other way around (1558), and the alias Savoy again (1559). Its owners for more than 360 years usually preferred Bell Savage, but also used Savage, even La Belle Sauvage, never Bel Bryant Lillywhite preferred Bell Savage in his massive work London signs and did not mention Bel Savage as an alternative.3 Besides, the place was originally, or at least in the fifteenth century, called the Bell, and an owner or manager was or had been one Savage. At Easter 1420 Reginald Broke kept potables there, atte belle vocata Sauagis Inne in fletestrete. And John French (ffrenssh) described it as Savagesynne alias . . . le Belle the Hope 5 February 1453 when he conveyed its ownership to his mother, Joan French, widow, for her life. Many things inn signs could be on the hoop: various fowls, a George, hart, crown, miter, angel, and bunch of grapes. A messuage in the Strand was also a the Hoop in 1403. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,247
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,540

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,003
Communication savante0,0050,002
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1620,026

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,216
Écart entre enseignants0,203 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMedieval & Renaissance drama in EnglandMême sujetShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismTravaux en français237 207