Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Mobile computing and networking
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Welcome to ACM MobiCom 2007, the Thirteenth Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, in Montreal, Canada. Continuing the tradition of one of the premier conferences in mobile networking, we have an exciting program on offer with papers, posters and panel, representing the best of today's research in mobile networking and computing!. We received 233 paper submissions from 28 countries, out of which 26 papers were accepted as full papers and 14 papers were accepted as Extended Abstracts to be presented as posters. The quality of papers was outstanding as usual, forcing many hard choices on the Technical Program Committee (TPC). To select the papers, we employed a three-phase process. First, the TPC selected papers from an access-controlled web site and provided reviews; then, we had an online discussion phase that selected about 80 papers for more detailed discussion; finally, we had a TPC meeting in Evanston, Illinois to discuss and select 40 papers for inclusion in the program, either as full papers or Extended Abstracts. The review process was double blind and every paper received at least three reviews, many received four, and some received five reviews. As in previous years, we have a Best Student Paper Award. The selection of the best student paper was done in two stages. First, a TPC sub-committee consisting of Farooq Anjum, Suman Banerjee, Sneha Kasera, Ben Liang and Mehul Motani short-listed candidate papers from among all full papers whose primary author was a student. These papers were reviewed in more detail, and discussed, after which consensus was reached on the winning paper. The MobiCom '07 Best Student Paper award goes to Crossing Over the Bounded Domain: From Exponential To Power-law Inter-meeting Time in MANET by Han Cai and Do Young Eun from North Carolina State University. Our congratulations to the authors. Coming to the technical program, we have a wide variety of papers and posters organized into eight sessions over three days. These include poster presentations of Extended Abstracts as well as student posters and demonstrations that were selected using a separate process from the papers. One of the sessions is dedicated to Challenge papers that describe revolutionary new approaches, technologies or visions to stimulate new research directions. We hope that you will find the MobiCom '07 technical program helpful in your research.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».