Information Technology Management: A critical Analysis of Managerial Impediments Facing Information Technology Managers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The paper intended to study managerial impediments which may hinder strategy and objective implementation by IT managers and technicians. The managerial drivers included: rules, initiatives, emotions, immediate action and integrity. This paper describes the drivers of strategy implementation by managers in IT departments to implement their organizational objectives. The findings on Perception of IT managers and administrators towards the managerial drivers of objective implementation by IT managers has put a lot of emphasis on rules and the lack of commitment of employees (the dimension of emotions) to explain the obstacles faced by IT managers. Though the finding of our data suggests that a driver of emotions is the most critical obstacle to IT management, there are important drivers, such as immediate action that will force managers to take emergencies to deal with urgent matters without compromising organizational objectives. Thus it also proves to be vital driver to IT management. Purpose: This research was carried out to investigate on the strategic impediments facing IT managers with regard to their attitudes and organizational perception. The study involved effective drivers of management, which constituted individual obstacles that IT administrators and technicians face during their objective implementation. Methodology: A mixed method of qualitative (focus group discussion) and quantitative (a survey with a questionnaire) approaches was applied to this study. These involved group discussion of IT technicians and administrators in the selected organizations in a Canadian province. The total number of surveyed managers was 147. Results : With regards to the drivers of management, it was established that the driver of emotions holds the highest consideration towards attitudes, management and employee motivation. This driver had, a frequency recorded 137, mean of 3.6923, median of 3.800 and standard deviation of 0.81950. The driver of rules was after analysis found to have a frequency of 145, a mean of 3.107, median of 3.400 and standard deviation of 0.76265. The driver of immediate action had a frequency of 134, mean of 3.1448, median of 3.200 and standard deviation of 0.86135. The driver of integrity had a frequency of 134, mean of 3.0489, median of 3.00 and standard deviation of 0.90948. The driver of initiatives had a frequency of 138; mean score of 3.4214, median of 3.45 and standard deviation of 0.85542. The summary of the report has been presents in table 2. Conclusion: This study is focused on the impediments experienced by IT managers as they implement their objectives. Taken as a whole, our findings suggest that, there are some impediments associated with drivers of Emotions, immediate action, Rules and initiatives. Even if these obstacles are in multiple levels to develop and promote IT management and objective implementation skills, it is imperative to study with more depth obstacles faced by IT managers in order to better understand how obstacles they face represent an impediment to the development of their competencies and effective performance in IT. Keywords: Information Management, Strategic and Objective implementation, Information technology (IT), Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».