MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1599976933 · doi:10.1353/gsr.2012.a465664

A History of German Theatre (review)

2012· article· en· W1599976933 sur OpenAlex
Helen Cafferty

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGerman Studies Review · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArts, Culture, and Music Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGermanDramaModernityModernism (music)Art historyHistoryNaturalismSpectacleRomanticismNarrativeGerman studiesRealismDramaturgyLiteratureArtPhilosophyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: A History of German Theatre Helen Cafferty A History of German Theatre. Edited by Simon Williams and Maik Hamburger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. Pp. xvii + 445. Cloth $122.00, Paper $55.00. ISBN 978-0521175357. The appearance of this volume on the history of German theater fills a void for English-speaking scholars and students of theater, comparative literature, European cultural history, and German studies, as well as theater practitioners interested in the unique evolution of theater in German-speaking Europe. Consisting of contributions by distinguished scholars from the United Kingdom, Ireland, Germany, the United States, and Canada, it is both ambitious in its aims and largely successful in attempting a historical narrative, a “stratified approach to history” (6), which avoids the rigidity of traditional, asynchronous periodization in favor of overlapping, parallel depictions. The first two chapters on medieval and baroque theater are left out of this approach, however, and the post-1945 contributions are somewhat less successful in this regard than the crucial discussions (chapters 3–6) of the intersecting and contrary aims of classicism, realism, romanticism and Sturm und Drang. In chapter 7 “The rise of the director, 1850–1939,” chapter 8 “Naturalism, expressionism and Brecht: Drama in dialogue with modernity, 1890–1960,” the following two chapters on architectural space and scenography in the twentieth century, and chapter 13 “Directors and actors in modern and contemporary German theatre,” tracing the role of the director provides a productive focus for different perspectives from modernism through postunification. This history of theater is unique in giving equal importance to interdisciplinary contextualization rather than subordinating it to the recitation of the major figures and themes in relation to intellectual and political history; the latter discussion is not just supplemented but transformed by the former. For example, the story of the evolution of national theater includes not only the familiar triad Germany/France/Shakespeare (1720–1832), but also the beginnings of realism anchored in aesthetics of staging, in political and economic history of provincial and urban sites, and in sociologically informed insights on class and reception. This means that such a towering figure in the history of German theater as Richard Wagner is first discussed in conjunction with realist staging, and thus shown to partake in various developing currents, rather than being characterized as belonging discretely to a single period. Such an approach to the generally acknowledged seminal era of German theater also provides a strong background for later chapters, for example chapter 6, “The theatre of dissent from Sturm und Drang to Brecht,” or chapter 10, “Experiments with architectural space in the German theatre,” which begins with a discussion of nineteenth-century experimental spaces. This is not to say that individual chapters cannot stand alone; [End Page 145] this balance is maintained well throughout, which makes the volume useful for a wide variety of readers: those wishing to gain a sophisticated historical understanding as well as those interested in a discrete period or perspective. The chapters on the history of nationalism’s influence (chapter 9) and interculturalism (chapter 14) achieve excellent syntheses of scattered English and German-language sources. Despite the advantages of avoiding a teleological narrative or unifying methodology in this history, the reader must contend with some slipping definitions and contradictions along the way (e.g., differing implicit definitions of “national” or “realism” in different articles). Even so, one would wish that the authors had gone even further to include more discussion of tangential intersections of theater with other high and low cultural theatrical expressions (e.g., agitprop, street theater, workers’ pageants [Massenfestspiele], opera, operetta) as well as the influence of film and photography on modern scenography and direction. However, this well written, thoroughly researched, engaging book is leading the way and belongs on reference lists and in all university libraries. Helen Cafferty Bowdoin College Copyright © 2012 German Studies Association

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,207
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,794

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,105
Tête enseignante GPT0,400
Écart entre enseignants0,295 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle