Celebrating Women: Gender, Festival Culture, and Bolshevik Ideology, 1910-1939
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Choi Chatterjee. Celebrating Women: Gender, Festival Culture, and Bolshevik Ideology, 1910-1939. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2002. x, 223 pp. Illustrations. Notes. Bibliography. Index. $34.95, cloth.Many visitors to former Soviet Union are familiar with International Women's Day-and just as many have likely dismissed March 8th holiday as a meaningless gesture, an annual opportunity to present flowers to grandmothers, sweethearts and female co-workers. In Celebrating Women, however, Choi Chatterjee convincingly argues for Women's Day's significance as chief locus for articulation of discourse for and about (p. 4). From its proclamation at Second International in 1910 until late 1930s, when it was universally recognized as a fundamental date on Soviet holiday calendar, International Women's Day celebrations came to significantly shape New Soviet Woman's public identity, influencing how women construed their roles, rights and responsibilities.Pravda and other Soviet media trumpeted Soviet women's amazing achievements and equal opportunities every March, and Chatterjee is quick to acknowledge that these pronouncements did not necessarily represent most women's experience of Soviet power. She thoughtfully addresses disparity between Soviet propaganda promised women and it delivered, and in so doing makes important contributions to historiography of Soviet approach to woman question.First, Celebrating Women seeks to analyze Soviet gendered propaganda on its own terms, in order to reveal what was saying (p. 7). The state's message must be deciphered, Chatterjee contends, before historians can explore how it was experienced. This is a valid assertion; at same time, wealth of memoirs, diaries and similar sources now available in former Soviet Union might provide material for conjecture about how official visions of Soviet womanhood were received. Furthermore, while Chatterjee diligently and inventively avails herself of a wide range of archival and published sources, information about how (or to extent) women's status was discussed and propaganda for women formulated at highest reaches of power remain unclear. In this case, however, relevant sources are likely inaccessible or non-existent. Notwithstanding these omissions, Celebrating Women provides a valuable investigation of Soviet said to women.Second, while Chatterjee condemns regime's misogynistic patriarchalism and its failure to socialize housework and childcare, she argues that Soviet promises of gender equality were, nevertheless, significant in and of themselves. As she insightfully argues, the capacity to articulate scenarios of radical change in women's lives was... in itself a form of political practice. Soviet women, unlike their counterparts in Third World, were given opportunity to imagine alternative lives and rethink their relationships to family, community, and state (p. 6).The monograph's six chapters unfold chronologically, beginning with Bolsheviks' 1913 sponsorship of Women's Day celebrations. Bolshevik involvement was driven primarily by tactical concerns as party sought an effective way to recruit women, political expediency overcoming socialist reluctance to appeal to women qua women. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».