MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W160194842

Investing in Our Next Generation: Overview of Orientation and Workshop Programs for Newly Hired Faculty in Canadian Universities (Part 1).

2008· article· en· W160194842 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dieter J. Schönwetter, Orla M. Nazarko

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œjournal of faculty development · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMentoring and Academic Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFaculty developmentHigher educationProfessional developmentSociologyMedical educationCareer developmentPublic relationsPsychologyManagementPedagogyPolitical scienceMedicine
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Newly hired faculty and their needs have been studied in various arenas in higher education. However, there is limited research documenting current newly hired faculty programming in Canadian institutions of higher education. The present study attempts to capture the various types of professional development programs for newly hired faculty at Canadian universities. An overview of 53 Canadian institutions' newly hired faculty programming is explored. These findings provide guidance for institutions looking to develop new programs for newly hired faculty, for current programs wishing to know what other institutions are doing for their newly hired faculty, and for those who are blazing the trail to be encouraged in the trends they have established in supporting newly hired faculty. The ultimate goal is to provide a Canadian perspective of what is currently being offered to support our newly hired faculty. As a first part in a two part series, this article focuses on the current overview of orientation programs, professional development workshop, and discussion group programs. The literature is rich with practical advice or best practices on how to foster the career development of newly hired faculty across the disciplines (Schonwetter & Nazarko, 2005) as well as within specific disciplines such as engineering (Davidson & Ambrose, 1 994), geography (Solem & Foote, 2006), medicine (Gaugler, 2004), nursing (Morin & Ashton, 2004), pharmacy (Raehl, 2002), psychology (Cohen et al, 2003) and social work (Maramaldi et al, 2004), and for minorities (Guanipa et al, 2003). Equally important is the research on newly hired faculty and their current state of needs (Schonwetter & Nazarko, 2005) as well as success predictors. The latter include senior colleagues and department heads in providing a supportive environment (Rice et al, 2000), supportive teaching developmental culture (Woods, 1999), mentoring (Maramaldi et al., 2004), and perceptions of control (Perry et al , 1 997). Many of these success factors are being introduced through institutional programming and services offered directly to newly hired faculty. However, there is limited research documenting the type of programs being offered across Canadian institutions that support our newly hired faculty. The present study attempts to capture the various types of professional development programs for newly hired faculty at Canadian universities. These findings provide guidance for educational specialists looking to develop new programs for newly hired faculty and an affirmation for those who are currently running programs that are consistent with the findings of this study, and an encouragement for those who are brave enough to move faculty development for newly hired faculty to new heights. The ultimate goal is to provide a national perspective of what is currently being offered to support newly hired faculty in order to enhance their retention at Canadian institutions of higher education. Literature on Newly Hired Faculty Programs and Services Faculty development programming and service abound in assisting newly hired faculty with the goals of improving teaching and professional service skills, the creation of a professional development plans, and active involvement in the campus community. For the most part, literature is very descriptive in the type of program goals and services for newly hired faculty, focusing on include newly hired faculty orientation programs (Morin & Ashton, 2004) as well as various faculty development programs geared specifically for newly hired faculty (Mackinnon, 2002), such as mentoring programs (Purnell, 2002), teaching development, research development, (Pierce, 2003), and learning communities (Richlin & Essington, 2004). Each of these is viewed as important for newly hired faculty. However, the extent to which current Canadian institutes of higher education are including these programs and service offerings for newly hired faculty is unknown. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: Incitatifs · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,995
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,478

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0030,001
Science ouverte0,0030,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,254
Tête enseignante GPT0,367
Écart entre enseignants0,113 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
DomaineIncitatifs
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œjournal of faculty developmentMême sujetMentoring and Academic DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207