MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1602303059

The Civil War Draft in Palmer: Reaction in a Small Town

2005· article· en· W1602303059 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amber L. Vaill

Notice bibliographique

RevueHistorical journal of Massachusetts · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueAmerican Constitutional Law and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLawSpanish Civil WarGovernment (linguistics)PoliticsDemocracySociologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

During the colonial era of American history, a militia system was used to supply the needed men for combat. These were citizens who were only called upon when they were needed; a standing army did not exist. The militia system was phased out for a volunteer system throughout the first half of the nineteenth century. This system, however, had its flaws as well due largely to the fact that it was difficult to secure volunteers. The Civil War was the first time that the United States ever had to use a military draft in order to keep enough soldiers in the field. Conscription, by its nature, was not a popular concept. No citizen of a democratic nation liked the idea of the government forcing him to do anything. In this case, the government was asking citizens to put their lives on the line. In some cases, conscription caused protests, riots and other types of demonstrations to take place. Although major events, such as the New York City draft riots of July 1863, are very well known, smaller forms of political protest occurred throughout the Union as well. The small town of Palmer, Massachusetts, is a prime example of the attitudes of many northerners during the initial draft. When war began in 1861, many men were willing to volunteer their services to their nation. The initial enlisting of volunteers secured 700,000 recruits; so many that secretary of War Edwin M. Stanton ordered recruiting offices closed. At this time, no one in the government could have foreseen the need for a draft two years later. By the early part of 1863, it became apparent that large numbers of men would soon be needed to replace those who were scheduled to be completing their terms of service by midyear. Men who had enlisted for two years at the start of the war were finishing their service, as well as the men who enlisted for nine months under the Militia Draft of 1862.1 Henry Wilson, Republican Senator from Massachusetts, first introduced the Enrollment Act of 1863 to Congress. The legislation stated that all men between the ages of twenty and forty-five were to be enrolled and possibly called up to join the service. There were to be exemptions made to men with special circumstances, such as those with a physical disability or those who were the sole supporters of motherless children. The true intention of the Act was to secure volunteers. The government hoped that those who were considering joining the Army would decide to do so if a draft was a possibility.2 The military did use other methods to secure volunteers. Bounties were offered to volunteers who joined the Army, giving various amounts of money depending on the local contributions to federal money. In October of 1863, the federal bounty was $300 for all three year volunteers. However, states and localities would often contribute sums of money in hopes of meeting their assigned quotas faster. The federal bounty was raised to $1000 in 1864 as the need for soldiers became even greater. During the course of the war, the government paid out approximately a half billion dollars in bounties.3 One problem presented by the bounty system was that there were people who took advantage of it. Some citizens would enlist in one district, collect the bounty, then travel to another district and attempt the same act. Those who were caught were treated as deserters and were forced into military service.4 The first draft was called in July of 1863. Although any male citizen who met the age criteria could be called into service, many of them still refused to serve under any circumstance. They looked for ways to gain exemptions, such as finding a physician who would provide documentation of an illness that would get them out of fighting. Others would run away to Canada, or even other counties if they had been drafted in their home county. Still others went as far as having all their teeth pulled. Due to loopholes in the law, those who were truly determined to find a way out of being drafted were able to do so. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,062
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,124

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0370,009
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0020,010
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,017
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,270
Écart entre enseignants0,248 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHistorical journal of MassachusettsMême sujetAmerican Constitutional Law and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207