MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1603648432 · doi:10.18174/186285

Lignin as a renewable aromatic resource for the chemical industry

2011· dissertation· en· W1603648432 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
R.J.A. Gosselink

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueLignin and Wood Chemistry
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesEuropean Commission
Mots-clésLigninBiorefineryPulp and paper industryRaw materialPulp (tooth)Lignocellulosic biomassBiofuelAdhesiveRenewable resourceOrganic chemistryChemistryMaterials scienceRenewable energyWaste managementEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

5-513 3 4-O-5 3 3nds to 1-position 1-3 3 Technical lignin types and their availabilityThe variation in technical lignin structure is partly caused by the botanical origin of the polyphenol but equally important is the method of extraction (Lora et al. 2008; Lora and Glasser 2002).Common pulping processes used for the extraction of lignin from lignocellulosic raw materials for the production of paper are listed below.The worldwide availability of technical lignins is presented in Table 1.3. Kraft pulping processThe most common chemical pulping process of wood today is the sulfate or kraft pulping process, a process using sodium sulfide under alkaline conditions.The lignin is partly cleaved and thiol groups were introduced at the -position of the propane side chain (Figure 1.8) resulting in a solubilized lignin.Kraft pulp mills have evolved in large efficient integrated facilities in which the recovery of pulping chemicals and 19 19 lignin is recovered by an alternative recovery process by acid precipitation, maturation and filtration giving novel types of sulfur-free lignin (Abcherli and Doppenberg 1998; Abcherli and Doppenberg 2000; Lora and Glasser 2002). Organosolv pulping and/or fractionation processesThe use of organic solvents, e.g.ethanol, allows avoiding the formation of sulfated byproducts.Organosolv pulping or fractionation enables the production of high quality cellulose AND high quality lignin.The water insoluble organosolv lignins are more pure containing a higher percentage of lignin.The major organosolv processes are the following: Lignol process, based on the Alcell ethanol/water pulping process, ASAM, Alkaline Sulfite Anthraquinone Methanol pulping, Organocell, Methanol pulping followed by anthraquinone/NaOH pulping, Acetosolv, an acetic acid/HCl pulping, Milox, formic acid/hydrogen peroxide delignification, Avidel, formic/acetic acid pulping.These processes are not commercial yet, but have been demonstrated at pilot and demonstration scale.Organosolv pulping or fractionation of lignocellulosic biomass is nowadays one of the selected pretreatments to produce high quality cellulose for pulp and/or biofuel production together with a high purity lignin for materials and chemicals.Both the Canadian company Lignol (former Alcell process; Hallberg et al. 2010) and the French company CIMV (Avidel process; Delmas 2008) are using an organosolv fractionation technology (Table 1.3).In this thesis, high purity organosolv lignins obtained from ethanol/water fractionations of mixed hardwoods (Alcell tm lignin) and wheat straw are studied for the production of aromatic chemicals described in Chapter 5. Biomass pretreatment and conversion (biorefinery)Examples of these biomass pretreatment and conversion processes are strong or dilute acid pretreated lignocellulosic biomass followed by enzymatic hydrolysis of the carbohydrates.The resulting lignin fraction contains a considerable amount of residual carbohydrates (Vishtal and Kraslawski 2011).No Medium l) Gnansounou (2010) m) Zimbardi et al. (1999) 1) Impurities are generally residual carbohydrates, ash and proteins and largely depends on feedstock and process 2) Former technology of Repap.Technologies, Canada (Alcell tm ) However, in oxidising atmosphere the char yields are lower.Carbonisation and solidification with maximum surface area of the char is obtained at 350-400C (Sharma et al. 2004).Below 300C no significant lignin degradation occurs, but volatile products are released due to dehydration, dehydrogenation, deoxygenation and decarboxylation reactions resulting from the breaking of weaker bonds and condensation reactions (rfo et al. 1999).At higher temperatures rearrangements take place producing volatiles (syngas: CO and H 2 ) and reactive free radicals reactions occur when also stronger bonds are broken (Ferdous et al. 2002).Phenolic components are the main volatile products that are released during the pyrolysis stage between 250-400 along Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO)In the early 80's kraft lignin was converted in a two-step "Lignol" process including hydrocracking and hydrodealkylation over an catalyst bed in hydrogen into 20% phenol and 14% benzene (Huibers and Parkhurst 1982).This process was highly selective but Supercritical depolymerizationBiorefinery processes aimed at liquefaction of lignocellulosic biomass and the extraction of valuable components for fermentation or recovery of chemicals are currently studied extensively.Different fluids were used to solubilize biomass and lignin for conversion and extraction of valuable compounds.is the production of monomeric phenolic compounds and these depolymerized aromatic chemicals are soluble in CO 2 .By selection of a CO 2 based fluid separation of the residual lignin and the produced mono-and oligomeric aromatic compounds can be accomplished.In this novel process the aromatic products were separated from insoluble residual lignin fragments and char by adiabatic pressure release.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,868
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,703

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,221
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations113
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetLignin and Wood ChemistryTravaux en français237 207