Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The father of modern implants – Professor Per-Ingvar Brånemark, surgeon, scholar, scientist, visionary, humanitarian, who changed the lives of countless patients and contemporary oral health care – has died at the age of 85 in Gothenburg, Sweden after a brilliant career The vision of P-I Brånemark led to the development of what he termed osseointegration (the structural and functional attachment of a titanium implant into living bone) and with it the predictable surgical placement of endogenous dental and facial implants as the means by which oral and facial rehabilitation became the acceptable and now routine way to replace lost and missing teeth and tissues. The development fundamentally changed the way dental and oral clinicians considered rehabilitation of lost teeth and tissues to optimize patient care. It was an inspirational experience for clinicians committed to providing prosthodontic rehabilitation but who had previously been limited to removable prostheses and fixed bridgework involving teeth. Their good fortune was to learn about this approach and be part of its introduction. The basis of the procedure was an understanding of bone biology through studies which progressed to a specific design for root form implants, precision formed from commercially pure titanium which was a key element in the success, as it led to biological integration with the ability to sustain load and function. The international awareness of this new development in 1981 occurred with the first report in an international journal, which captured the innovation and predictable management of complete edentulism with osseointegrated implants and dramatically improved the quality of life of those unable to function with complete dentures. Later single tooth implants and short span implant bridgework continued to transform clinical management of restorative dentistry and prosthodontics. The Toronto Conference in 1982 brought the information to North America and was the catalyst for the rapid spread of the support industry and additional implant systems, some of which challenged the biology and science which underlined the original controlled development. Internationally, Australia became involved very early with simultaneous replication studies conducted at the University of Sydney and the University of Western Australia, together with subsequent involvement in university-sponsored training and education programmes. Australia was fortunate to enjoy a close collaboration with Professor Brånemark, and as a result has remained at the forefront of research, development, innovation and clinical application. Contemporary demands for immediacy in case management have been a driver for change in clinical practice. P-I emphasized a systematic approach involving clinical trials and the careful training of clinicians to ensure the delivery of optimum care. Competitive dental practice and industry initiatives need to reflect on this approach to ensure that professional standards initially set are maintained. The passing of our esteemed leader, colleague and friend, allows us to reflect on his life, his achievements, his passion and commitment to helping rehabilitate those in greatest need, and to marvel at the continual inspiration of the man and his contributions – a legacy of benefit to more and more grateful patients and clinicians who have had the privilege to be part of the osseointegration story and to acknowledge its transformation of clinical practice.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,015 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle