Reference and Information Services in the 21st Century: An Introduction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cassell, Kay Ann and Uma Hiremath. Reference and Information Services in the 21st Century: An Introduction. 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Neal-Schuman Publishers, 2009. xvii, 461 pp. 69.95 USD. ISBN-13: 978-1-55570-672-2. ∞Cassell and Hiremath have produced a very well written, well researched introduction to reference and information services. This second edition is approximately 80 pages longer than the first edition (2006) and it deals with a number of technological changes in libraries in the last three years, notably the increasing prominence of Google and the enormous digitization projects that are now under way around the world.The book is divided into four main sections: Fundamental Concepts, in which the authors discuss the theory and practice of reference and information service; Introduction to Major Reference Works, in which they discuss categories of reference sources; Special Topics, which includes detailed information about reference sources in different subject areas or subject disciplines, and Developing and Managing Reference Collections and Services, in which the authors deal with issues such as collection development, evaluating reference sources, managing reference departments, assessing the quality and adequacy of reference services, and includes the authors' reflections on the likely technological and social implications of reference services in the decades to come. They discuss topics such as Web 2.0, social networking, RSS feeds, and Virtual Reference and note (p. 390) that although these technological developments are in a state of constant change, it is possible to find patterns that make 2.0 such an attractive addition to the traditional reference arsenal.It is particularly gratifying to see that the authors regularly refer to Canadian and British reference sources and institutions, rather than restricting themselves to those from the United States. There are also frequent references to the information services that are provided by sister institutions, reminding the reader that even though reference and information services may be provided at one institution, they may draw on the expertise and resources of many.The authors deal with the ethical issues that reference librarians sometimes face. They provide a good discussion of the reference interview process and some of the pitfalls that librarians encounter, and they remind librarians that they may frequently be called upon to provide reference service in disciplines where they have no professional expertise, and that they should always be aware of this as they assist library users.Occasionally, the authors trap themselves with of terms or concepts. By stating that ... share one major characteristic: they provide definitions (p. 125), the authors would appear to eliminate resources such as picture dictionaries, dictionaries of dates, or biographical dictionaries. It would be more helpful to recognize that the term is applied very widely, to many types of information resources, and to deal with the different categories of reference sources that include the word in the title, or are organized in a dictionary format. Many subject areas or disciplines, such as literature, music, political science and the social sciences, deal with complex terms or concepts that are arguably more than simply words that must be defined. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,011 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,014 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».