Book Review: Personality Disorders: Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Cognitive Therapy of Personality Disorders. Second Edition. Aaron T Beck, Arthur Freeman, Denise D Davis, and Associates. New York: Guilford Press; 2004. 412 p. US$46.00. Reviewer rating: Fair This is a disappointing volume, even though it presents valuable concepts for understanding the cognitive component of personality disorder, as well as many useful interventions. The first edition, published in 1990, was a seminal contribution that offered a new perspective on the treatment of personality disorder, a topic previously dominated almost entirely by therapies based on psychoanalytic theory. In it, Beck and colleagues offered an innovative perspective that had a major impact. The limitation of the first edition was its modest evidential support for both overall approach and specific treatment strategies. Indeed, the authors noted that this was embarrassing in a mode of treatment that advocates empiricism. The widely anticipated second edition was expected to correct this deficiency by offering a theory that was more coherent and solidly grounded in empirical findings and evidence-based interventions. Alas, this volume fails to deliver. This edition has 16 chapters. The first 5 offer an overview of cognitive therapy for personality disorder, present the rudiments of a theory of personality disorder, discuss issues of assessment, outline general principles and specialized techniques, and explore the important issue of the therapeutic relationship. They are followed by 10 chapters, each describing the psychopathology and cognitive therapy of a specific disorder. All the DSM-IV personality disorders are considered, except for schizotypal and passive-aggressive personality disorder. The last chapter offers a brief synthesis and comments on prospects. Chapter 2 purports to describe a theory of personality disorder. The first edition offered a sketchy framework comprising a somewhat loosely arranged set of constructs and ideas. Although many of these ideas were useful, and probably essential, components of any theory, they were not systematically articulated. The corresponding chapter in this second edition offers little that is new. It combines the first edition's Chapters 2 and 3 and offers almost identical layout and subheadings-as if the field of personality disorder had remained unchanged for the last 15 years. In fact, ideas about the disorder's nature, origins, and classification have changed markedly and continue to do so. Many of these developments are barely referenced, let alone incorporated into the model or into intervention strategies. This is part of a more general problem: the book is written with scant attention to the context of scholarship in related fields. Particularly problematic is its neglect of current work on normal personality, especially research on cognitive approaches to personality. This research provides a body of knowledge about personality processes that could have greatly enriched the reviewed volume's framework and contributed to a more solid conceptual model. As with the first edition, much of this volume is organized in terms of DSM-IV diagnoses. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».