MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1606991012

A Conversation with John Relyea, Part 1

2011· article· en· W1606991012 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Leslie Holmes

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Singing · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésConversationSingingGuitarPsychologyVisual artsSociologyArtCommunicationManagement
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

CONTINUING MY CONVERSATION with bass baritone John Relyea in the Press Porch at Tanglewood . . . Leslie Holmes: Did your father start teaching you? John Relyea: Yes. He ended up teaching me for the first three or four years. I would be playing guitar, and making all kind of noise in the basement just below where he was teaching. One day he said to me, know, I think we should work on your singing. He could hear, just from my talking voice, that there was something to be accessed. He just started messing around with it one day, when I was about seventeen. It was a very easy thing, because I had listened to him all my life. I had sort of a built-in sense of how to make that sound. It started with a certain amount of imitation, but we do have very similar voices. It was a very natural way to learn. When I was twenty-one, I went down to Curtis. LH: Did you audition for other schools? How did you happen to end up at Curtis? JR: I just heard from various people what a great place it was. I had already been doing some concert work. I knew, just comparing it with other schools like Juilliard, that I thought I needed a place that was smaller, so I could get a little more focus and not be so worried about getting lost in the shuffle. My father had worked with Michael Ellison, and he liked him a lot. So, I went down there and auditioned. There were 500 people auditioning that year, and five of us got in. It was an exciting experience. LH: That must have been rather affirming. JR: Yes, it was. I had already been on the concert circuit in Canada, and I thought I couldn't get off that easy and not go to school. LH: I understand, from some of your comments, that your father is still giving you a lot of input. JR: Oh, yes. That will never stop and, most of the time, I'm open to it. They go to all of the telecasts. I bought them a Sirius radio for Christmas. He's very much in contact with what I do, on a day to day basis. If it's got anything to do with the Met, he usually gets to hear me once or twice a week, when I'm there. He's the first person who taught me to sing, so we talk about all of my lingo and the core ideas, and are very much on the same wave length. The main challenge for me was finding my own sound, after I'd been imitating him for the first three or four years. And I'd say that it took another three or four years, after that, to find my own voice. Working with Hines helped, in that regard. He was very good at finding my own physical resonance in my body. LH: He was at Curtis? JR: No. When I was at Curtis, I worked with Edward Zambara, who's since passed away. At the time he was working at Curtis, at Juilliard, and at Boston Conservatory. I worked with him for a while, and really got a lot of legato and the bel canto approach with him. I wasn't at Curtis for long, because I got into the Merola Program. LH: Did they come to Curtis to audition people, or did you go out there? JR: I went out there [San Francisco] . That was '95. I was still only in my second or third year at Curtis. So, I didn't finish there. If you do Merola, its a big opportunity. LH: You were also an Adler Fellow. JR: Yes, right after that. LH: How did that help you? JR: Oh, immensely. I had had limited experience with opera, up to that point in my life. So, I went from doing very little opera to doing it four or five nights a week. LH: I think Lotfi Monsouri was there. JR: Oh, yes. He taught me so much about preparing and creating characters . . . building them. He took a particular interest in me, in developing the role of Figaro, for instance. LH: And you took it on the road to thirty different states in a bus. JR: Yes. LH: It is too bad that Western Opera Theater is no longer. JR: It's a shame. It's one of those things that, if you can do that, you can pretty much do anything. It's a lot. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,017
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,096
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,320

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,017
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0150,003
Communication savante0,0070,007
Science ouverte0,0020,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,015
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0960,040

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,200
Écart entre enseignants0,169 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of SingingMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207