MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1624270067 · doi:10.1353/bhm.2015.0036

Sir Thomas Browne: A Life by Reid Barbour (review)

2015· article· en· W1624270067 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Natalie Kaoukji

Notice bibliographique

RevueBulletin of the history of medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedical History and Innovations
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSection (typography)ClassicsHistoryArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Sir Thomas Browne: A Life by Reid Barbour Natalie Kaoukji Reid Barbour. Sir Thomas Browne: A Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. xiv + 534 pp. Ill. £70.00 (978-0-19-967988-1). Sir Thomas Browne: A Life presents an account of Thomas Browne’s life beyond the world of books—immersed in a world of travel, exchange, urban civic and mercantile cultures, medical practice, and domestic life. It draws principally on institutional records, works by Browne’s contemporaries, and Browne’s own notebooks and correspondence. The book is organized into three parts: Browne’s early years (London 1605–16, Winchester and Ireland 1616–23, Oxford 1623–31), his medical training in Europe (Montpellier 1631–32, Padua 1632–33, Leiden 1633–34), and his later life as author and practicing physician (Halifax 1634–37 and Norwich 1637–82). For the first two sections, Barbour seeks to reconstruct Browne’s early life through the medical worlds of Oxford, Montpelier, Padua, and Leiden, drawing on university records, selected works of professors of medicine (including Liceti, Imperiale, Riviere, Scharpe, Ranchin, Silvaticus, Sala), contemporary travel accounts, and secondary literature on the regions; for the third section, he seeks to extend the world of Browne’s authorial strategies, antiquarianism, and medical practice beyond East Anglia, charting the influence of Browne’s published works further afield and Browne’s two-way engagement with the wider intellectual sphere through his extensive correspondence and his medical notebooks. The third section is significantly longer than the others (at 304 pp., 56 pp., and 74 pp., respectively), and is likely to be of greatest interest to historians of medicine, presenting material that is likely to be less familiar. It offers an insight into Browne’s medical correspondence, his day-to-day medical practice, medical notebooks, antiquarian studies and his navigation, on behalf of his son Edward, of the institutions of the Royal Society and the Royal College of Physicians. It offers an excellent case study in the relationship between local medical practice and extended intellectual networks, and offers opportunities for reflection on the ways in which antiquarian methodologies and global trade networks sat together in the framework of seventeenth-century natural knowledge. In his presentation of Browne’s extension of the medical consultation to correspondence with other physicians Barbour offers a picture of seventeenth-century medical practice as hovering between the closed patient–physician encounter and the network of reports of the distant and unseen more commonly associated with natural philosophical and antiquarian knowledge economies. The organization of the book is primarily oriented to chronology. Three themes nonetheless seem to recur throughout the work: first, the valorizing of the lowly, local, domestic, and particular—a notion captured in a reported detail of Browne’s home furnishing, a picture of Ovid’s Baucis and Philemon situating the gods in a humble domestic scene (a late eighteenth-century version of which provides the book’s cover image); second, a preoccupation with place and the relationship between locality, travel, and reading, particularly configured in the relationship between Browne’s largely unwritten early travels and his static later life made mobile through writing; and third, the question of the relationship between [End Page 341] direct and indirect experience underwriting Barbour’s endeavor in the work to present Browne’s travels, practice, and life as the source of material for his works. A great deal of material here will be of interest to historians of medicine. Nonetheless the lack of medico-historical perspective in some of the discussion, and particularly in section 2, can be problematic. The use of evidence in this section can be a little uncritical, and the discussions of early modern medical texts are lacking a broader perspective of commonly held views from which to distinguish distinctive or characteristic ones. In the natural philosophical and medical contextualization more broadly, Barbour’s readings tend to be underpinned by an expectation of opposition between religious, medical, antiquarian, and what are characterized as Baconian and empirical orders of knowledge. A shift of focus that took as read the methodological and conceptual continuity between these spheres may perhaps have allowed for many of the subsections to bear more directly on one another. There are...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,227
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,980

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0210,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,069
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,160 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBulletin of the history of medicineMême sujetMedical History and InnovationsTravaux en français237 207