MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1624804537 · doi:10.1184/r1/6724094

Ultrasonic Techniques for Baseline-Free Damage Detection in Structures

2010· article· en· W1624804537 sur OpenAlex
Debaditya Dutta

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch Showcase @ Carnegie Mellon University (Carnegie Mellon University) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueUltrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNational Research FoundationNational Research Foundation of KoreaCarnegie Mellon UniversityBombardierMinistry of Education, Science and TechnologyNational Science Foundation
Mots-clésBaseline (sea)Ultrasonic sensorComputer scienceAcousticsArtificial intelligenceGeologyPhysics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This research presents ultrasonic techniques for baseline-free damage detection in structures in the context of structural health monitoring (SHM). Conventional SHM methods compare signals obtained from the pristine condition of a structure (baseline signals) with those from the current state, and relate certain changes in the signal characteristics to damage. While this approach has been successful in the laboratory, there are certain drawbacks of depending on baseline signals in real field applications. Data from the pristine condition are not available for most existing structures. Even if they are available, operational and environmental variations tend to mask the effect of damage on the signal characteristics. Most important, baseline measurements may become meaningless while assessing the condition of a structure after an extreme event such as an earthquake or a hurricane. Such events may destroy the sensors themselves and require installation of new sensors at different locations on the structure. Baselinefree structural damage detection can broaden the scope of SHM in the scenarios described above. A detailed discussion on the philosophy of baseline-free damage detection is provided in Chapter 1. Following this discussion, the research questions are formulated. The organization of this document and the major contributions of this research are also listed in this chapter. Chapter 2 describes a fully automated baseline-free technique for notch and crack detection in plates using a collocated pair of piezoelectric wafer transducers for measuring ultrasonic signals. Signal component corresponding to the damage induced mode-converted Lamb waves is extracted by processing the originally measured ultrasonic signals. The damage index is computed as a function of this mode-converted Lamb wave signal component. An over-determined system of Lamb wave measurements is used to find a least-square estimate of the measurement errors. This error estimate serves as the damage threshold and prevents the occurrences of false alarms resulting from imperfections and noise in the measurement system. The threshold computation from only the measured signals is they key behind baseline-free damage detection in plates. Chapters 3 and 4 are concerned with nonlinear ultrasonic techniques for crack detection in metallic structures. Chapter 3 describes a nonlinear guided wave technique based on the principle of super-harmonic production due to crack induced nonlinearity. A semi-analytical method is formulated to investigate the behavior of a bilinear crack model. Upon comparing the behavior with experimental observations, it is inferred that a bilinear model can only partially capture the signal characteristics arising from a fatigue crack. A correlation between the extents of nonlinear behavior of a breathing crack with the different stages of the fatigue crack growth is also made in Chapter 3. In Chapter 4, a nonlinear system identification method through coherence measurement is proposed. A popular electro-magnetic impedance circuit was used to detect acoustic nonlinearity produced by a crack. Chapters 5 and 6 comprise the final part of this thesis where wavefield images from a scanning laser vibrometer are digitally processed to detect defects in composite structures. Once processed, the defect in the scanned surface stands out as an outlier in the background of the undamaged area. An outlier analysis algorithm is then implemented to detect and localize the damage automatically. In Chapter 5, exploratory groundwork on wavefield imaging is done by obtaining wave propagation images from specimens made of different materials and with different geometries. In Chapter 6, a hitherto unnoted phenomenon of standing wave formation in delaminated composite plates is observed and explained. Novel signal and image processing techniques are also proposed in this chapter, of which the isolation of standing waves using wavenumber-frequency domain manipulation and the use of Laplacian image filtering technique deserve special mention.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,438
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,254
Écart entre enseignants0,232 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle