MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1630132851 · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2010.01089.x

Douglas Orson ReVelle (1945–2010)

2010· article· en· W1630132851 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Peter Brown

Notice bibliographique

RevueMeteoritics and Planetary Science · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAstro and Planetary Science
Établissements canadiensWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMeteoroidMeteor (satellite)Atmosphere (unit)InfrasoundGunpowderHistoryMeteorologyAstrobiologyPhysicsArchaeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Douglas O. ReVelle died unexpectedly on May 2, 2010, following a brief illness. Doug was born in Rochester, NY, the youngest of three boys, all of whom pursued careers in the sciences. Doug was a leading meteor scientist with long-standing interests in many theoretical problems related to meteor entry, acoustic production from bright fireballs, and the flux of meteoroids at the Earth. He was trained as an atmospheric scientist at the University of Michigan in the late 1960s and early 1970s. His early research interest focused on problems of meteor entry and particularly shock processes in the atmosphere created by the hypersonic passage of meteoroids. This dual interest in how the atmosphere affected meteoroids and vice-versa was the defining theme in his future research where he effectively bridged the disparate areas of meteor science and infrasound studies. His 1976 paper “On meteor-generated infrasound” laid the modern foundations for interpretation and analysis of infrasound from meteors. He also recognized, together with Gene Shoemaker, that airwave recordings made by the U.S. military of large fireballs could be used to directly estimate the influx of meter-sized bodies to the Earth. This was a project he revisited many times over a period of some 30 years, most recently publishing a final estimate based on these data only a few years before his death. Doug’s early research career was as a post doctoral fellow at the Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics in Ottawa working with Peter Millman and Bruce McIntosh, and later at the Carnegie Institution in Washington with George Wetherill. His research at this time focused on interpretation of meteoroid entry, fireball observations, and bolide kinematics. Together with Wetherill, he examined the Prairie network fireball data and identified those events most plausibly producing meteorites on the ground. This work served as the backdrop to his ongoing theoretical model comparisons among the three known meteorite- producing fireballs (Príbřam, Lost City, and Innisfree). A major goal of this work was to reconcile the disparate estimates of photometric and single-body dynamic masses from fireball data. His work in this area continued until quite recently, culminating in publication in 2005, together with Zdenek Ceplecha, of a comprehensive model of bolide ablation, explicitly accounting for the role of fragmentation and establishing a new, modern scale for fireball luminous efficiency. This new model resolved this long-standing difference between photometric and dynamic mass scales in fireball data, identifying fragmentation as the underlying cause. It also provided the framework for a new level of understanding of how objects fragment in the atmosphere and, by extension, the physical properties of larger meteoroids. His later research was performed as a technical staff member at the Los Alamos National Laboratory and focused more on infrasound monitoring than bolide research. During his tenure at Los Alamos he was able to develop a new acoustic-gravity wave model of shock production from bolides and further extend his numerical entry modeling work to very large fireballs, and apply this work to very large fireballs observed by U.S. government satellite systems. Doug retired from Los Alamos in February, 2010, but he continued active research until just before his death. His irrepressible love of all aspects of meteor research and his energy for the field he so cherished was apparent to all those who were fortunate enough to work with him over the years. He will be deeply missed by his many colleagues and friends around the world.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,179
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,205
Écart entre enseignants0,198 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMeteoritics and Planetary ScienceMême sujetAstro and Planetary ScienceTravaux en français237 207