Prayers, Petitions, and Protests: The Catholic Church and the Ontario Schools Crisis in the Windsor Border Region, 1910–1928 by Jack D. Cecillon (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Prayers, Petitions, and Protests: The Catholic Church and the Ontario Schools Crisis in the Windsor Border Region, 1910–1928 by Jack D. Cecillon Anthony Di Mascio Prayers, Petitions, and Protests: The Catholic Church and the Ontario Schools Crisis in the Windsor Border Region, 1910–1928. By Jack D. Cecillon. (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. 2013. Pp. xxvi, 367. $100.00. ISBN 978-0-773-54161-0.) In Prayers, Petitions, and Protests Jack D. Cecillon aims to examine the failure of French Catholics in the Windsor border region to resist Regulation 17, the Ontario government’s attempt in the early-twentieth century to limit French-language instruction in the province’s public schools. More than that, however, this book offers [End Page 393] a deep understanding of the larger debates surrounding French-English relations and the rise of French Canadian nationalism in the early-twentieth century. Cecillon’s book has three major historiographical strengths. First, his study reminds us of the extent to which the “old French Empire” extended beyond the borders of Quebec and select parts of New Brunswick and Manitoba (p. 12). In the writing of Canadian history, the more familiar disputes in those provinces, which led to an 1871 law prohibiting local school boards from raising tax revenues in support of Catholic schools in New Brunswick and 1890 legislation eliminating public funding for French Catholic schools in Manitoba, have received considerable attention. As Cecillon demonstrates, however, protests in the Windsor border region of Ontario from 1910 to 1928 were no less dramatic. Second, this book broadens our understanding of francophone history in Ontario significantly. Typical studies on francophone resistance to Regulation 17 tend to focus on eastern Ontario, where recent French-Catholic arrivals from Quebec were still struggling to make sense of their new provincial home. Cecillon, however, takes us to the other end of the province, where francophone families had a long history of settlement and socioeconomic activity. There, Cecillon finds a French Canadian population that was itself divided: urban versus rural, industrial versus agricultural, and old-stock Fort Detroit descendants versus recent arrivals. Such divisions created a complicated dynamic that produced varieties of resistance to Regulation 17 not seen in other parts of the province. Third, a major strength of this book is the author’s insistence that a micro-history of Catholic Windsor’s response to, and internal struggle with, Regulation 17 be situated within larger North American and international contexts of church efforts to integrate cultural and linguistic minorities. Parallels to what was happening in late-nineteenth-century New England, for example, are clear to Cecillon. The Church’s response to growing hostility from Americans in that region toward an influx of French-speaking settlers from Quebec helps us better understand what was happening in Ontario. Moreover, Cecillon beautifully explores the extent to which appeals to Rome, and the responses from the Vatican itself, were central to the debate surrounding Regulation 17 in Ontario. In other words, understanding the context of French-Catholic resistance to Regulation 17 requires the reader to understand the broader Catholic world of which the people were a part. Whereas typical histories tend to focus on the linguistic identity of French Canadians, this study rightly considers their Catholic identity as well. In the end, the author succeeds in his effort to unveil the existence of a multidimensional French-speaking population—one with often conflicting priorities. Such divisions were too profound to overcome in the Windsor border region, and francophone resistance to Regulation 17 ultimately failed there. Cecillon’s book will be essential reading for anyone wishing to understand the history of French Canadians in Ontario. Moreover, it will be of great interest to anyone wishing to more closely examine and make sense of the ways in which the French-English [End Page 394] divide in Canada has shaped the many cultures and subcultures of Canadian and Catholic identities. Anthony Di Mascio Bishop’s University Sherbrooke, Canada Copyright © 2015 The Catholic University of America Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».