Notice bibliographique
Résumé
When Iosif Romanyuk wrote to me to let me know that the “Magnetic Stars — 2010” meeting was being organised at the Special Astrophysical Observatory, I wondered — as I always do — whether I should go to the meeting. Obtaining a Russian visa requires a lot of advance planning, and I always seem to have to send my passport off for the actual visa just when I need the passport for another trip. Furthermore, the actual trip to SAO is really long and strenuous. There is about 18 or 20 hours of travel from Ontario to Moscow, through my very least favourite airport (Frankfurt), a short overnight stay in Moscow (with long trips to and from the airports), and then the flight to Mineralnye Vody and the bus trip to the Observatory the next day. The two-day return trip, typically requiring a flight that leaves one of the Moscow airports before 6 a. m., can be even more tiring. But, as I always have since I first came to a “Magnetic Stars” meeting at SAO in 1999, I decided that of course I would attend. These meetings are simply too valuable (and too enjoyable) to miss. Why do I always decide to come? The size of the meeting, roughly 50 participants, is ideal for intense interaction. It makes possible a relaxed workshop environment, with enough time for each lecture for the speaker to explain his or her work in some detail. And there is time to discuss the talks with the speakers and look at the posters. Even more importantly, the talks present a lot of really interesting new science and important results. In my field, this is certainly one of the most important occasions to meet with other people who share a lot of interests and discuss new work. This meeting is an excellent occasion to get to know Russian, Ukrainian, and Eastern European colleagues better. When we meet at larger meetings such as the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union, there are usually so many people present that there is little time to spend with any one in person. In contrast, at a small meeting like this one, there is plenty of opportunity to talk with colleagues I don’t yet know well, and to discuss ongoing projects with collaborators such as Tanya Ryabchikova. One aspect of the meeting that I appreciate very much is the large number of very fine talks presented by young astronomers. It is really encouraging to see bright young people moving into the fields covered by the SAO “Magnetic Stars” meetings, and to hear about their ideas and projects. And of course one of the most important reasons for coming is the opportunity to spend time talking with the members of the SAO “Magnetic Mafia”, founded by Yurii Glagolevskij and now ably led by Iosif Romanyuk with assistance from Dmitry Kudryavtsev.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,042 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,012 | 0,010 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,007 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,251 | 0,172 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».