MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1641094164

Early Childhood Inclusion: A Silver Lining in the Dark Clouds for African Immigrant Children?.

2010· article· en· W1641094164 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joseph Seyram Agbenyega, Chris Peers

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueYouth Education and Societal Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRefugeeImmigrationSierra leonePolitical scienceScrutinyHuman rightsRacismGender studiesSociologyCriminologyLawEthnology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Since the break-out of civil wars during the late 1990s and early 2000s in some sub-Saharan African countries such as Liberia, Sudan, and Sierra Leone, substantial numbers of African refugees have entered Australia (Vicker, 2007). conspicuous presence of dark-skinned African people in 'white' dominated nation, Australia, makes them target for public and media scrutiny (Casimiro, Hancock & Northcote, 2007; Hancock, 2009; RRAC, 2002). Hancock (2009) acknowledges sweeping, unverified claims, and stereotyping impacts on community perceptions and treatment of African people, creating fear and suspicion (p. 2). Suspicion and feeling of exclusion are sources of potential tension and harmful consequences for individuals from African immigrant community (Andrews & Sibbel, 2003; RRAC, 2002). For example, in 2007, the then Australian Immigration Minister, Kevin Andrews, claimed that young African refugees are involved in race-based gangs and nightclub fights (Hancock, 2009), coupled with engaging in crime and drinking in parks at night (Evidence' sparks new refugee row, 2007; Lampathakis, 2007). Concerns have been expressed by some politicians in Australia about the general lack of African immigrants' inability to integrate properly into Australian society (Hancock, 2009). Canadian Council for Refugees, refugee rights NGOs in Australia, the Refugee Council of Australia, the Victorian Human Rights Consultation Committee, and members of the public have denounced the discriminatory comments by the Government of Australia. Yet, on 14th August 2009 racist leaflets warning residents of an influx of Africans moving to live in their neighborhoods have been sighted in some suburbs in Victoria, Australia. first spate of material was sighted on car windscreens in Mildura, in northwestern Victoria, claiming the local council had tried to sneak 30 Sudanese refugee families into their city. leaflet claims Sudanese refugees will cause endless social terrorism and bring a primitive lawless tribal culture and pack mentality into the community. It asserts that people of Sudanese origin are 400 to 800 per cent more likely to commit serious crime than an Australian national and that many of them are infected with AIDS. In Frankston, suburb of Melbourne, an anonymous leaflet under police investigation after it was found in mailboxes and on car windscreens reads: Do you want Frankston to become like Dandenong? The levels of violence in Dandenong and Noble Park have risen sharply since the huge increase in the African (Last.fm., 14/08/2009). (Note: Dandenong is suburb in Melbourne where this study was conducted. It has high population of African migrants). With research suggesting that there is increasing discrimination against African immigrants in Australia (Casimiro, Hancock & Northcote, 2007; Hancock, 2009; RRAC, 2002), there are compelling grounds for research to investigate the perception of sub-Saharan African immigrant patents regarding their children's wellbeing in early childhood settings in Australia. This pilot study was conducted in light of current major reform designed to improve and provide for quality and equity in early childhood education in Australia. Australian National Early Years Learning Framework (EYLF) supports the provision of inclusive-based approach to delivering services to children and families. It is program geared towards holistic education of all children (socialisation and childcare). framework is consistent with rights-based approach that emphasises high quality, integrated, seamless systems of early childhood education and care (DEEWR, 2009). purpose of the national quality framework is to drive systems-wide quality to provide education, care equity and support to all children, and families (DEEWR, 2009). It is consistent with Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Right of the Child: State parties shall respect and ensure the rights set forth in the present Convention to each child within their jurisdiction without discrimination of any kind, irrespective of the child's or his or her parent's or legal guardian's race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national, ethnic or social origin, property, disability, birth or other status (United Nations, 1990, p. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,865
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,958

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,293
Écart entre enseignants0,281 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetYouth Education and Societal DynamicsTravaux en français237 207