MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1652830209

AN AFRICAN HERBAL PHARMACOPEIA COULD UNDERPIN THE MEDICINAL PLANT INDUSTRY ON THE AFRICAN CONTINENT

2009· article· en· W1652830209 sur OpenAlex
Ameenah Gurib‐Fakim

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueAfrican Journal of Traditional Complementary and Alternative Medicines · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueEthnobotanical and Medicinal Plants Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinal plantsPharmacopoeiaGeographyMateria medicaTraditional medicineChinaAgricultureQuarter (Canadian coin)AgroforestryAncient historyMedicineHistoryBiologyAlternative medicineArchaeology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Paper prepared and presented on behalf of the ’Association of African Medicinal Plants Standards – AAMPS’ Africa is a continent endowed with enormous wealth of plant resources. Over 5000 distinct species are known to occur in the forest regions alone and most of them have been used for several centuries in traditional medicine for the prevention and treatment of diseases. African traditional medicine is the oldest and perhaps the most diverse of all medicine systems. The biological and cultural diversity of Africa is reflected in the marked regional differences in healing practices and unfortunately the various systems are poorly recorded and remain so to this day. Yet ancient kingdoms and empires of Africa had extensively codified healing practices. African Materia Medica consists of a mixture of many elements and includes many potent herbs. Few of these are, however, yet recognised in modern pharmacopoeias. Exceptions are Strophanthus, Kola, Catharanthus and Harpagophytum which have been included in several western pharmacopoeias. Although there are several important research publications on medicinal plants from Africa, the study of African medicinal plants has remained fragmented and neglected as compared to India and China. To date Africa has only contributed 83 of the world’s 1100 leading commercial medicinal plants despite the fact that the Sub-Saharan region as well as the Indian Ocean Islands, contain approximately 60.000 plant species – roughly a quarter of the world’s total. The potential that this represents for the business and agricultural sectors is enormous but Africa will lag behind unless it prepares internationally recognised medicinal plant standards. The Medicinal Plants Forum for Commonwealth Africa held in Cape Town in 2000, highlighted the lack of suitable technical specifications and quality control standards as a major constraint to the African herbal industry. Moreover the lack of official recognition from governments generally has been the major handicap to what could become an important income and foreign exchange earner for the continent. A follow up meeting in 2005 witnessed the creation of the Association of African Medicinal Plants Standards (AAMPS) a non profit making company registered in Mauritius set up to implement recommendations outlined in the Centurion Declaration which advocated the preparation of an African Herbal Pharmacopoeia. Over 50 standards have since then been prepared by a team of internationally renowned experts covering most of the most important African medicinal plants. The Association hopes that the publication of these monographs will inter alia, increase Africa’s capacity to build a viable herbal industry incorporating Good Agricultural, Good Manufacturing and Good Laboratory Practices and above all increase the visibility of African Medicinal plants as a source of income generation. Since 2005, AAMPS has established itself as the leading organisation working on medicinal plant standards on the continent. A Scientific Advisory Committee has been established and a number of long term projects have been launched to enable AAMPS to become a self-sustaining entity. These include AAMPS Publishing, which will produce books, manuals and some simple merchandising products including possibly a photo-library service specialising in African medicinal plants and herbal products. AAMPS aims at providing also a laboratory and technical network and a Consultancy and Management Service. In collaboration with other international bodies such as the International Foundation for Sciences (IFS), AAMPS will today launch a joint Fellowship programme and award an annual AAMPS/IFS prize for lifetime achievements in the promotion of African medicinal and aromatic plants. More details on the services to be provided for AAMPS can be obtained form the website: http://www.aamps.org

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,599
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,643

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,117
Tête enseignante GPT0,307
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle