MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W166006704

Room for a view: Kentucky jelly

2001· article· en· W166006704 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueAmerican Literature and Humor Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPleasureWitnessSympathyArt historyArtVisual artsLawPsychologyPolitical scienceSocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

It wasn't as if I were complaining or anything. Not exactly. I was merely stating, into the open air, that it was seven hours into an eight-hour shift, and that in all that time I had not eaten a single bite or had so much as a sip of coffee. Granted, this was announced within earshot of several other members of the emergency department staff, who could have heard me if they chose to. But my statement received even less pseudo-sympathy than I had anticipated. In fact, it was utterly ignored. I skulked out of the ER, dodging several nurses along the way who I knew took pleasure in making me work. I headed to the coffee machine. The lounge was blessedly quiet. Over in one corner stood my little friend Mr. Coffee, ready to listen to my woes with an open and sympathetic ear while simultaneously dispensing a consoling hot beverage. I plunked a few coins into the slot, and the exclamatory “Product being prepared — Watch!!” appeared in the liquid-crystal display on the front of the machine. Below this a clear rectangular window invited me to witness my coffee being conjured up in the precise and mechanized bowels of the machine. The invitation turned out to be more of a warning, for no sooner had my attention wandered than the machine splashed what felt like molten tar generously onto my scrubs in the vicinity of my groin. To think that my walk out of the ER was a skulk. My return, sporting a conspicuous and muddy stain on my pants — now that was a skulk. It seemed that even the coffee machine conspired against me, and I had even paid the little sucker. I threw on a new pair of scrubs over my stained ones, my stomach rumbling miserably, and approached the charge nurse. Certainly she would see reason and allow me to sneak away for a quick bite. “Well, now that you mention it,” she said, “Mr. Duncan in room 5 has a complaint about the food here. He has asked for you specifically, and I told him you'd be right in.” She exchanged a knowing smile with a few of the other nurses. Looking at that smile, I wondered how I could ever have imagined I would see sympathy there. Sympathy is an emotion ordinarily felt only by humans. I headed morosely over to room 5. The patient in room 5 was a pleasant and elderly chap, just shy of birthday number 93, from Possumtrot County in the Deep South. In previous conversations he had seemed to take little comfort in my admiring comments that, for his age, he was in remarkably good health. Having been in hospital before, he wanted no part of the experience, least of all the food. At that moment I was beginning to feel as though I would give anything, anything at all, just to have a tray of food to complain about. I wondered vaguely if I should offer to pull my car up out front so he could jump in and we could screech off together into the night, straight to the nearest Denny's. Mr. Duncan sat upright, a small and hunched little chap, his wrinkled face frowning down at what appeared to be someone's scientific version of breakfast on his tray. I asked him what the matter was. “It ain't so much the taters,” he said. “And I don't much mind the aigs neither. But I'll say I don't much care for the Kentucky Jelly, tell you what.” He motioned to two small white and silver packets on the table beside his food tray. Written across the white side of each packet, in bold blue letters, was “KY Jelly.” My smile, perhaps a little wooden to begin with, became downright oaken when I glanced at his toast, covered in a layer of glistening, clear gel. There was a single large bite (such a healthy bite, for a 93 year old!) out of the side of one of these toasted triangles. “Now I want to see if'n you disagree,” Mr. Duncan said, holding out in supplication a slice of toast toward me. His hand shook ever so slightly; a long, quivering, stalactite of goo was hanging from the toast. Several gratified-looking nurses had gathered in the doorway behind me. My teeth were becoming dry, so wide was my smile. “I've been to Kentucky plenty, and don't never recall having jelly like this before.” My choices seemed to be either to explain that somehow we had substituted a popular brand of lubricant for his grape jelly, or to simply play along. After all, there was some toast in it for me, and KY is perfectly harmless to ingest. Isn't it? And so I did what just about anyone would have done in a similar situation, I suppose. I took the coward's way out. I accepted the piece of toast from him gingerly and chewed off one corner, just chewed right on through that smile. Actually, it wasn't all that bad. A little greasy, perhaps, and slightly sweet. I took a second, more enthusiastic bite, even managing a hearty “Mmmmm!” “Well, I'll be,” Mr. Duncan said quietly, shaking his head and beginning to look at me as if I were a particularly gifted lab rat. Behind me, the nurses could no longer suppress their laughter. “I didn't think you'd fall for it,” he said. I looked at him, slowly lowering my toast. “You mean … ” “Son, what do I look like, a dang fool? Here, have some more toast.” The nurses were in gales now as he held out the second piece of lubricated bread. But at least one good thing came of it. “Uh, no thanks,” I said. “I'm not really that hungry any more.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,602
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,989

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0120,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle