76 PRODUCTION OF CLONED BOVINE TRANSGENIC EMBRYOS WITH VARIOUS TYPES OF MONO-COLONY CELLS AND OVUM PICKUP
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objective of this study was to determine the effects of genetic manipulation, cell type, and culture conditions on developmental potential of bovine nuclear transfer (NT) embryos. Ovum pickup (OPU) technology was developed to obtain the oocytes for NT. A total 4044 cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were obtained during 492 OPU sessions, with an average of 8.2 COCs recovered each session. Cultured granulosa cells (CGC), bovine fetal (150 days) oviduct epidermic cells (FOEC), and adult ear skin fibroblasts (ASFC) were used as donor cells for NT and were transfected with the expression vector including human FIX coding sequence directed by goat ß-casein promoter and neomycin gene. The cells were screened under 800 µg mL-1 G418 for 10–14 days until the apperance of a “mono-colony” of cells which were then picked. Each cell population was expanded by consecutive passage culture under 300 µg mL-1 G418 until used for NT, ensuring that the majority of cells were transgenic. Oocytes were enucleated at 20 h post-maturation and a single donor cell was transferred into the perivitelline space of a recipient oocyte. After fusion and activation, the reconstructed embryos were co-cultured with vero cells in B2 medium for 7 days. NT efficiency between primary granulosa cells (PGC) without in vitro culture and CGC, as well as among CGC, FOEC and ASFC that were transfected with exogenous DNA (named TCGC, TFOEC, TASFC, respectively), were compared (Table 1). Differences between groups were verified by chi-square test using SAS 6.12 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) program. CGCs presented a higher fusion rate (P < 0.01) for reconstructed embryos and higher development to the blastocyst stage for NT embryos than did PGC (67% vs. 54% and 41% vs. 21%, respectively). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in cleavage rate (65%, 71%, and 69%, respectively) and development to the blastocyst stage for NT embryos (36%, 30% and 40%, respectively) for TCGC, TFOEC, and TASFC. A total of 86 blastocysts were selected for transfer into uteri of 86 cows, resulting in 26 pregnancies (30%) at 60 days by ultrasound scanning. Among these, 12 cows remain pregnant and 14 have aborted. The results indicated that oocytes recovered from OPU can be successfully used for NT with development to the blasocyst stage. PGC, CGC, FOEC, and ASFC can all be used for generating transgenic cattle by NT, although this needs to be verified by the birth of live calves. Table 1. Nuclear transfer efficiency with various cell types This work was supported by the Chinese “863” High-Tech Plan Program (Grant No. 2002AA206201).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».