Literary, Cultural, and Disability Studies: A Tripartite Approach to Poststructuralism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
second of two events hosted by Lancaster University's Centre for Disability Research (CeDR) in June 2009, A Tripartite Approach to offered a chance to reconsider what poststructuralist theory (in all its varied forms) can offer Literary, Cultural, and Disability Studies. Organised by Hannah Morgan and David Bolt, with help in chair from their CeDR colleagues Carol Thomas and Donna Reeve, event attracted participants from America, Canada, and mainland Europe, as well as scholars from UK, representing a wide range of disciplinary perspectives. event opened with first of two keynote presentations, Theorising Psyche in Disability Studies: Poststructuralist Contributions of Deleuze and Lacan. In this paper Dan Goodley (Manchester Metropolitan University) explored what psychoanalytic theory can offer Disability Studies, suggesting that Lacanian theory, in particular, offers insight into way disabled people are subject to misrecognition, and can help expose particular ideologies about disability. However, he identified a more productive way forward in work of Deleuze and in particular concept of body-without-organs. His argument is developed further in article Bringing Psyche back into Disability Studies: Case of Body with/out Organs, which is included in this special issue. first panel began by heralding another article in issue, Against Interpretosis: Deleuze, Disability, and Difference by Phil Bayliss (University of Exeter). Focusing on Deleuze and Guattari's concepts of interpretosis and facialization, this complex presentation moved from Mitchell and Snyder's narrative prosthesis to importance of counter-cultural narratives via Kristeva's signifiance. Next in panel, John Marris (Trent University) focused on particular representations of disability in Cripping 'Gift': Exploring Representations of Autistic Spectrum and Autistic Savant in Cinema. Using work of Robert McRuer and Rosemarie Garland-Thomson to examine films Rain Man, Mercury Rising, and more recent Snow Cake, he argued that, despite its attempts to offer a representation of autism not defined by savantism, Snow Cake still suffers from the Rain Man effect. In an engaging presentation, he argued that ultimately a more constructive critique of autistic representation may be found in films that do not seek to define their characters as autistic. afternoon session began with another keynote presentation, from Robert McRuer (George Washington University). The Pleasure of Disabled Text: Crip Theory and Poststructuralism was a fascinating exploration of different ideologies and perspectives at work in Disability Studies today. Taking his own book, Crip Theory: Cultural Signs of Queerness and Disability, and Tobin Siebers' Disability Theory as emblematic, Professor McRuer analysed similarities and differences between poststructuralist approaches to disability (or those sympathetic to poststructuralism), and post-positivist realism favoured by Future of Minority Studies Group in US. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,015 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,018 | 0,067 |
| Communication savante | 0,019 | 0,019 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,014 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».