The International Geoscience Program (IGCP): An Established Program with New Priorities
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The International Geoscience Program (IGCP) has been active for over 30 years, since its launch in Montreal in 1972 as the International Geological Correlation Project. IGCP was designed to provide support for bringing together researchers in the geological sciences to identify an important research question, establish a plan for addressing the topic, and initiate collaborative research; synthesis and publication of the results is an integral part of IGCP projects. Multi-national and multi-disciplinary projects, especially those involving Developing countries, are a priority. Funding for these 5-year cooperative projects is provided through IUGS (International Union of Geological Sciences) and UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization). IGCP has enjoyed a reputation for being among the most successful international scientific programs. Canada has a proud tradition of involvement in IGCP, participating in about half of the more than 400 projects to date and providing many of the project’s international leaders. On a per capita basis, Canada has had the highest participation rate in the world. Canadians have also played a prominent role on the UNESCO-IGCP International Scientific Board, with Canadian geologists serving on the Board nearly every year since 1972. Canada also has provided financial support to Canadians for participation in approved IGCP projects through its Canadian National Committee (CNCIGCP), which receives applications and makes awards each spring. Although funding is modest, this support has been an important element in sustaining Canadian activities. A full article on the history of IGCP in Canada is in preparation. Applications for financial support are made to UNESCO-IGCP, and decisions are made by the International Advisory Board, which is composed of 20 geoscientists from 16 countries, appointed jointly by IUGS and UNESCO. Approved projects have ranged broadly in nature, and have spanned the full spectrum of geological sciences, including both basic and applied topics. In many cases, IGCP support has provided a basis for securing funding from other organizations and has led to an expansion of the research beyond the term of the award. On average, there have been 40-60 IGCP projects active worldwide each year. In 2006, a more focused approach for new projects was put into place by UNESCO [http://www.unesco. org/science/earth]. Although applications for projects on “traditional” geological topics are still welcome, more importance is being placed on IGCP projects that emphasize societal relevance. The modifications are also designed to promote more multiand inter-disciplinary research in several broad areas: • Geoscience of the water cycle, • Geohazards, • Earth resources: sustaining our society, • Global change and evolution of life, • The deep Earth, and • A new topic to be identified each year.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,026 | 0,019 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,006 | 0,021 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,028 | 0,011 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».