MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1675387119 · doi:10.1093/pch/10.1.15

A mother's concern for her child with diabetes

2005· article· en· W1675387119 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lorraine Kelly

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDiabetes Management and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFaithPoint (geometry)PsychologyMedicinePhilosophyTheologyMathematics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

My son, Daniel (Figure 1), is entering grade 2 this year and as we head out in late August with the school's list of supplies he'll require, I make a few notes for additional items that he'll need. Daniel is thrilled to see that we need a large box of sugary fruit snacks to treat low blood sugar at school. He's not so delighted about the fresh box of keto-sticks we need, but he learned long ago that there is no point worrying about all this ‘stuff’. We're nearing the end of Daniel's third year with type 1 diabetes and I'm not sure he remembers much about the life before finger pokes and injections. Daniel on his way to school Daniel on his way to school I've become gradually more comfortable with the idea of sending him off to school. It's a bit of a leap of faith believing that strangers, in conjunction with a six-year-old boy, can cope with this chronic condition for 6 h a day. But I've done everything I can think of to prepare both Daniel and the school staff for this responsibility. My biggest fear when I say goodbye to Daniel each morning will be that he will have a severely low blood sugar. If Daniel plays extra hard at recess or doesn't finish eating, his blood sugar can drop quickly. Along with high and low blood sugars, a second concern is the effect of those blood sugar extremes on Daniel's ability to concentrate at school. Finally, I want to ensure that Daniel doesn't feel too different from other kids. I don't want his diabetes to define him. I want him to go to birthday parties (and eat cake!). To counter our concerns, my husband and I have tried to make Daniel as independent as possible. He has always been able to check his own blood sugar. We ensure he has a fruit leather in his pocket each morning. He knows more about diabetes than most of the grown-ups around him so we instruct him to eat the sugar in his pocket when he feels low, even if adults tell him he can't eat now. We are fortunate that he generally knows when he is feeling low and rarely gets it wrong. Daniel is the only child at his school with type 1 diabetes. When kindergarten began, I anxiously reviewed all the back-to-school materials provided by the Alberta Children's Hospital and the Canadian Diabetes Association. I completed a detailed form with information specific to Daniel, including targets for blood sugar, symptoms and treatment of high and low blood sugar, a photograph ofDaniel and when to contact me. Each year, I meet with Daniel's teacher before the start of the school year and go through the materials. The information is posted in the classroom and the staff room. When Daniel started grade 1 and would be encountering more teachers and staff, the school nurse did a lunch presentation to educate the rest of the staff about type 1 diabetes. I rest easier knowing that the staff will know what to do in an emergency. Thankfully, there have been no emergencies. The teachers and staff go out of their way to make my son's experiences at school safe, educational and enjoyable. One afternoon, when Daniel was getting low, one of the teachers sat down with him at the little table in the back of the classroom and shared her orange with him. He came home beaming about how they “treat him like a king around there”. It just doesn't get much better than that. (Well, a cure would be nice, but that's a topic for another day!)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,079

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,301
Écart entre enseignants0,282 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetDiabetes Management and Research→Travaux en français237 207→