Minimizing delays in DNA retrieval: The “freezer method” for glass coverslip removal. Letter to the editor regarding comparative study of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis on cytology smears and surgical pathology specimens from primary and metastatic lung carcinomas
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Removing the glass coverslips for retrieving DNA from archival slides can be time-consuming, as pointed out by Khode et al.1 Traditionally, xylene has been used as the solvent for glass coverslip removal, which can take several days and thereby impose delays in molecular assays. We want to bring their attention to a method that applies “freezing” to old stained slides that can overcome this problem. The method was described for slides requiring restaining or destaining,2 but we have been using it in projects that involved molecular analysis, shortening the time required for getting the slides ready for DNA extraction. According to the “freezer method,”2 the slide should be placed flat in the freezer as the initial step. Although the original recommendation described a maximum exposure of 10 minutes to one hour, in our experience slides can rest in the freezer (at a temperature of −20°C) for only 1 to 2 minutes. After removing the slide from the freezer and wearing eye protection, immediately place the tip of a scalpel blade under one corner edge of the coverslip, lift up the coverslip, and remove it. The slide should be still frozen/cold when using the blade, otherwise the technique will not work. If the coverslip fails to lift off, return the slide to the freezer for an additional minute. If the coverslip still does not lift off during that period of time, it may indicate that the mounting medium was applied too recently. After the coverslip has been removed, allow the now uncoverslipped slide to return to room temperature before soaking it in xylene for 1 or 2 minutes until the remaining mounting media has been removed. The slide can be then sent for manual or laser capture microdissection for collecting cells for DNA extraction. Similar approaches have described how to remove coverslips from Araldite-mounted preparations using an ice block on the surface of the coverslip and liquid nitrogen.3 Apparently the basic principle consists of the differences in freezing between the glass slide and the mounting media. Archival stained smears and cytospin preparations are a precious source of DNA for molecular analysis and in some cases might be the only resource for detecting molecular abnormalities such as mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), BRAF, and KRAS genes to direct targeted therapies.4, 5 We anticipate the broad use of archival slides in studies involving cases with exhausted histological material or those with only cytological specimens as a source for DNA. The “freezer method” for coverslip removal can facilitate the preparation of these samples. The authors made no disclosures. Gilda da Cunha Santos, MD, PhD, FRCPC, FIAC1,2 Monica Schroder, MLT2 Julie Baoqian Zhu, MSc, MLT, SCT(ASCP)2 Mauro Ajaj Saieg, MD, PhD3 William R. Geddie, MD, FRCPC1,2 Scott L. Boerner, MD, FRCPC1,2 Scott McDonald, BSc, MLT2 1Department of Laboratory Medicine andPathobiologyUniversity of TorontoToronto, Ontario, Canada 2Laboratory Medicine ProgramUniversity Health NetworkToronto, Ontario, Canada 3Department of PathologySanta Casa Medical School Sao PauloSao Paulo, Brazil
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle