Augmented Experiences: What Can Mobile Augmented Reality Offer Museums and Historic Sites?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Contemporary museums are active places of edutainment where storytelling is as valuable as artefacts. Museums strive to create exciting and memorable experiences for visitors, including technophiles. This helps maintaining and attracting visitors, and therefore, financially sustains these cultural institutions. To achieve their goals, museums are increasingly exploring and adopting information and communication technologies to enhance visiting experience. Most recently, mobile augmented reality (AR) technology has found its way into museums and historic sites premises. As a medium for enriching human senses and mixing real and virtual worlds, mobile AR offers state-of-art opportunities to spatially and conceptually orient visitors. However, the growing number of museum mobile AR projects outweighs their systematic evaluations. Since designing and developing mobile AR projects consumes considerable time and resources, empirical investigation of such projects is a necessity. Although the literature recognizes this necessity, there is still a lack of systematic evaluation studies. Furthermore, among the few studies, most lack the validity that comes with employing true experiments with control and randomization. As a result, the literature lacks empirical evidence to guide future projects in the field. This research empirically investigates the application of mobile AR for enhancing visits to museums and historic sites. It focuses on the effectiveness of mobile AR for enhancing navigation and increasing informal learning and enjoyment in outdoor museums. I conducted the research investigations in two studies. For each study, I designed, co-developed, and evaluated a mobile AR prototype for use in Heritage Park, an outdoor living history museum in Calgary, Canada. The summative evaluation of each study, empirically and rigorously evaluated the objectives of the prototypes in a true experiment. Results from the experiments show that mobile AR experiences can effectively enhance museums and historic sites visiting experience by making outdoor navigation more informed and efficient as well as increasing some categories of informal learning, enjoyment, and interest. The results also show that the positive impacts of a mobile AR experience can increase intensification and gift purchases in museum gift shops. Such impact might contribute to these cultural institutions financially, and offset the costs of developing the mobile AR content.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle