When your native language sounds foreign : a phonetic investigation into first language attrition
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The research presented in this thesis comprises two experiments which investigated\nwhether the domain of phonetics can undergo first language attrition, or be lost, when a\nsecond language is acquired in adulthood in a migrant context.\nExperiment I investigated the native speech of 57 German migrants to Anglophone\nCanada and the Dutch Netherlands. The bilingual migrants had grown up in a monolingual\nGerman environment and moved abroad in adolescence or adulthood. Their semispontaneous\nGerman speech was globally assessed for foreign accent by native German\nspeakers in Germany. It was revealed that 14 bilingual migrants were perceived to be\nnon-native speakers of German. Age of arrival to Canada or the Netherlands and contact\nwith one’s native language played the most significant roles in determining whether the\nGerman speech of the migrants was assessed to be foreign accented. Crucially, it was not\nonly the amount of contact, but also the type of contact which influenced foreign accented\nnative speech. Monolingual settings, in which little language mixing was assumed to occur,\nwere most conducive to maintaining non-foreign accented native German speech.\nThese findings prompted Experiment II, in which the speech of 10 German migrants\nto Anglophone Canada was examined in fine phonetic detail. The participants in this\nexperiment had similarly grown up in a German speaking environment and migrated to\nCanada in late adolescence or adulthood. Segmental and prosodic elements of speech,\nwhich generally differ between German and English, were selected for acoustic analyses.\nGiven that each phonetic element was measured according to two dimensions, it was possible\nto determine that in the lateral phoneme /l/, the frequency of F1 was more likely to\nevidence first language attrition than the frequency of F2; and that in the prenuclear rise,\nthe alignment of the start of the rise was more likely to display first language attrition than\nthe alignment of the end. In addition to intrapersonal variation within the same phonetic\nvariable, interpersonal variation was observed. Two participants evidenced no first language\nattrition, whilst one participant realised both dimensions of the lateral phoneme /l/\nand prenuclear tonal alignment according to the Englishmonolingual norm in his German.\nWhen extralinguistic variables were investigated, age of arrival (and neither amount nor\ntype of language contact) had a significant impact on determining first language attrition,\nalthough this effect was only observed in the alignment of the prenuclear rise.\nWhile the experiments revealed stability in the native speech of late consecutive bilingual\nmigrants, first language attrition in the domain of phonetics was observed at both the\nlevel of perception and performance. Taken together, these findings challenge the traditional\nconcept of native speech by revealing that indeed native speakers diverge from the\nnorms of native (monolingual) speech.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».