MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1689277300

A Different Kind of Doctor: Seeking Social Justice through Medicine

2006· article· en· W1689277300 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Kittler

Notice bibliographique

RevueEurope PMC (PubMed Central) · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPovertyHealth careQuarter (Canadian coin)MedicineEconomic JusticePediatricsFamily medicineHistoryPolitical scienceLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The practice of medicine changes rapidly, and with new advances in medical technology, the overall state of health of Canada’s children is arguably the best it’s ever been. Despite numerous advances in the field of pediatrics, however, not all Canadian children are better off. According to Dr. Gilles Julien, a professor of social pediatrics at McGill University and University of Montreal, many children remain left behind. In his recent book A Different Kind of Care: The Social Pediatrics Approach, Dr. Julien argues that even in a country with one of the world’s best healthcare systems, the health of many Canadian children remains at risk. The reason? Not all Canadian children experience and interface with the healthcare system in the same way. As a social pediatrician, the children about whom Dr. Julien is most concerned are those who are at the greatest risk of failing to reach their potential in life, those who, often because of the effects of living in poverty, require a different kind of pediatric care than that provided by more conventional pediatric practice. Dr. Julien writes that even today, a quarter of Canadian children live in poverty. Healthcare inequalities are problematic in Canada despite a relatively accessible and enviable healthcare system. As Julien writes, “In recent years, diseases that could more aptly be called ‘social’ have replaced a number of infectious diseases that have practically disappeared. While…disease control systems are much more sophisticated, the fact remains that the socioeconomic gradient of disease has remained relatively stable, particularly for children.” In A Different Kind of Care, Julien outlines the theory and approach of social pediatrics, and provides a number of examples of patients who have benefited from such an approach. In synopsis, social pediatrics involves widening the lens through which one views a child’s health, and diversifying the players involved in promoting and maintaining that child’s health. When considering the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children, one cannot separate health status from socioeconomic status, family background, and living conditions. The children at the greatest risk of “social” diseases require care from more than just a single social pediatrician; they require the integrated care of a community network created with the children’s best interests in mind. Social pediatrics recognizes the importance of this contextualized community approach to child well-being and seeks to facilitate the involvement of family members, teachers, social workers, friends, and anyone else relevant to a child’s mental and physical health. In practice, social pediatrics borrows a bit from the field of psychiatry, a bit from public health, and a bit from community health. It is easy to understand Julien’s theories on social pediatrics and why the approach works. Furthermore, it’s clear from the cases which he presents that the application of these theories benefits a great diversity of vulnerable children. These vulnerable children may be more likely to suffer from all sorts of illnesses, everything from asthma to headaches to sleep disturbances to eating disorders. I found myself inspired by Julien’s work, yet left with many questions about how he actually accomplishes what he does. Easily convinced of the importance of a broader, more global approach to the health of the most socially disadvantaged children, I wanted more details on the day-to-day practice of social pediatrics. What are the best ways to integrate various community members in the care of a single child? What are the logistics of maintaining clear communication among so many players? What does a typical day look like for a social pediatrician like Dr. Julien, if there is a typical day? And how do social pediatricians interface with the more conventional health care system? Regardless of my lingering questions about the details and logistics of exactly how social pediatrics works, A Different Kind of Care successfully conveyed the value of the social pediatrics approach. Julien’s work is a refreshing reminder about the importance of service in medicine, and a testament to the role physicians can play in fostering social justice.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,114
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,227

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,021
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0340,077
Communication savante0,0160,019
Science ouverte0,0020,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0120,025
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,052
Tête enseignante GPT0,345
Écart entre enseignants0,293 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEurope PMC (PubMed Central)→Même sujetChild and Adolescent Health→Travaux en français237 207→