MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1702573345 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2011.01676.x

Do we truly appreciate how difficult it is for patients with schizophrenia to adapt a healthy lifestyle?

2011· letter· en· W1702573345 sur OpenAlexaff
Mehrul Hasnain, W. Victor, R. Vieweg

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Psychiatrica Scandinavica · 2011
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSchizophrenia research and treatment
Établissements canadiensMemorial University of Newfoundland
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePopulationBody mass indexGerontologyPsychiatryInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Vancampfort et al. (1) compared 60 Belgian patients with schizophrenia and 40 healthy volunteers according to the distance they walked in 6 min and explored the relationship between their performance on this task with their routine participation in physical activities and their physical self-perception. Selection dictated that patients were more likely to be obese and have preexisting painful musculoskeletal conditions. They were also more likely to smoke. As expected, patients with schizophrenia walked significantly shorter distances than controls and became short of breath easily. Their performance improved with decreasing adiposity but even normal weight patients walked about 95 fewer meters in 6 min than the controls. Patients participated less in leisure or sport-related physical activities (and likely had fewer resources and opportunities to do so) than the controls. Regarding self-perception, patients were significantly more likely than controls to rank themselves poorly on sports competence, physical self-worth, and body attractiveness. A healthier body mass index (BMI) projected into a more favorable self-perception. A recent editorial in Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica underlined many of the adverse consequences of schizophrenia (2). Compared with the general population, they commonly live below the poverty line, are three times as often smokers, and commonly suffer from substance abuse disorders. Half are obese, their risk of diabetes is doubled, they have increased medical morbidity, and they die over 20 years sooner than the general population – notably from cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and suicide. Despite knowledge of and efforts made to correct these risk factors, the mortality gap between patients with schizophrenia and the general population has not changed over the last two decades (2, 3). Adapting a healthful lifestyle is a process that involves appreciation of its importance, motivation to plan a change, and physical, psychological and material resources to adhere to the plan. Patients with schizophrenia are at a disadvantage at each step of this process. Schizophrenia is an illness of cognition, perception, affect and volition. Despite best treatment, deficits in these mental faculties persist in most cases causing variable degree of impairment in ability to effectively plan and follow-through. Patients with severe, noticeable residual deficits may receive case management services but those with mild, subtle deficits usually do not. Their efforts to eat healthfully are undermined by the appetite stimulating effect of their medications. Besides, the atypical antipsychotic medications may also promote their responsiveness to external eating cues (4). For these patients quitting smoking is also harder than it is for individuals without schizophrenia. Nicotine provides greater stimulation and state-enhancement for them than it does for healthy individuals (5). They also have a poorer appreciation of the risks associated with smoking (5). Recurrent episodes of acute psychosis are frequent in patients with schizophrenia and disrupt any efforts they might make towards a healthful lifestyle. The findings of Vancampfort et al. (1) are not unique to patients with schizophrenia. Decrease in functional exercise capacity with smoking and adiposity, development of painful musculoskeletal conditions with obesity, and diminishing physical self-worth with increasing adiposity and lack of participation in physical activities would be expected even in individuals without schizophrenia. What is unique to patients with schizophrenia is their greater difficulty in breaking the pattern of unhealthful lifestyle and preventing its consequences due to factors related to their illness and its treatment. Till the time our approach to the care of patients with schizophrenia takes this into account, both at policy-making and clinical levels, the outcome of patients with schizophrenia is unlikely to change.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,014
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,026

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,032
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,003
Communication savante0,0050,007
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0140,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,257 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa Psychiatrica ScandinavicaMême sujetSchizophrenia research and treatmentTravaux en français237 207