Ephemeral Territories: Representing Nation, Home, and Identity in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Competing notions of nationalism, pluralism, and identity represent key questions confronting those who would like to posit a simple definition of what it means to be Canadian.As Erin Manning points out in Ephemeral Territories, these questions have often been framed in terms of a French/English divide, an understandable tendency given the political, linguistic, and cultural tensions underwriting Canadian history, but one that does not fully speak to the larger issue of being constantly displaced.Displacement, exile, and loss frame Manning's analysis of identity as depicted in a variety of Canadian media, including artwork by Robert Racine, Anne Michaels' award-winning novel Fugitive Pieces, and films by Atom Egoyan, Clement Virgo, Srinivas Krishna, and Robert Lepage.In embarking on her study of home and belonging, Manning borrows inspiration for her title from a passage in Saint-Exupéry's Le Petit Prince in which the little prince is informed that ephemeral objects, which are soon bound to disappear, are not suitable objects for inquiry or transcription.Manning, who considers this attitude representative of current academic attitudes toward the ephemeral, opens her own discussion on this subject by drawing on a theoretical framework informed by concepts such as ontopology, deterritorialization, and errant politics.In ontopology, Jacques Derrida fuses notions of being and place, notions that Manning uses in her discussion of the way our attempts at simple existence inevitably require us to engage with, and often pay homage to, the idea of nationalism despite an awareness of its problematic aspects.Our ability to feel at home in any nation, including Canada, often rests upon a sense of assurance that interlopers will be kept away from our borders.Complicating this tenuous security, however, is what Manning considers a state of permanent homelessness, or awareness of not belonging, that is quintessentially Canadian.In her analysis of some of the films mentioned above, Manning examines various states of homelessness, many of which are tied to questions of ethnicity and class, but all of which foreground a struggle to attain power in its different forms and to construct a sense of identity.Referring to Robert Sack and Arjun Appadurai in her discussion of deterritorialization, Manning suggests that our relationship to the space we inhabit is never unproblematic, but is instead the result of power relations, usually unequal ones.Deterritorialization does not explode these relations but is one step in the process of accepting that home and security are, in many ways, figments of an imagination anchored in the idea of nationalism and statehood.In analyzing texts created by Canadians, Manning states that she is not hewing to such traditional notions of the nation-state, but instead discussing cross-cultural motifs in each work that speak of, and to, a world transformed by shifting cultures and borders.In Fugitive Pieces, as the title implies, a sense of statelessness haunts the main characters despite their travels and despite their stated assessment of Canada as a place of refuge.In Charles Binamé's Eldorado, both the wealthy and the homeless experience inexpressible yearning for all that a house is supposed to represent, and yet their understanding of rules, regulations, and citizenship represents a stumbling block in what should be a mutually accommodating relationship.The chapters in which Manning dissects texts such as these are the most engaging ones in the book, skilfully combining elements of the theoretical discussion that frames the book with concrete and poignant examples of homelessness and insecurity found in all kinds of Canadian media and among a variety of social groups.While Manning does not downplay the sense of marginalization experienced by visible minorities, the poor, or the homeless, she is also careful to point out that the wealthy and the privileged can also fall victim to an unfulfilled need for inclusion.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,025 | 0,017 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».