MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W173174967 · doi:10.1093/pch/13.2.97

Suspected abusive head trauma: Guidelines for a multidisciplinary approach

2008· article· en· W173174967 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Sue Bennett

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChild Abuse and Related Trauma
Établissements canadiensChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHead traumaMultidisciplinary approachMedicineHead (geology)SurgeryGeology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Cases of suspected abusive head injury are invariably a challenge for all involved professionals. A multidisciplinary approach affords the opportunity to share complementary perspectives, roles and mandates that lead to a comprehensive case plan. While the investigation of suspected abusive head injury will frequently be initiated by the treating physician (usually the paediatrician), the quality and quantity of evidence gathered by social services and police are crucial if children are to be protected from the abuse, abusers are to be punished and miscarriages of justice are to be avoided. The Multidisciplinary Guidelines on the Identification, Investigation and Management of Suspected Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) were developed by a multidisciplinary group to equip professionals in health services, child care and education, child protection, police services and the justice system with a tool to identify, investigate and initially manage cases of suspected AHT. They are intended to be generic enough to assist large or small communities in developing a response appropriate to their specific needs and resources. The core principle is that they should be used in the best interest of the child. The guidelines have been a work in progress since May 1999, when the First Canadian Conference on Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) was held in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. At the conference, a framework for a national strategy on SBS was developed. The three components of the strategy are the Joint Statement on Shaken Baby Syndrome (1), the present multidisciplinary guidelines and a communication network on AHT. The Saskatchewan Institute on Prevention of Handicaps provided the initial leadership in developing the three components of the national strategy. Many other agencies and individuals provided invaluable assistance and, thus, the development of the strategy has been a truly Canadian, multidisciplinary and multiagency effort. As part of the third component of the strategy, the Child and Youth Maltreatment Section of the Canadian Paediatric Society was established in June 2004, and is committed to the review and dissemination of these guidelines as a priority project. To achieve this goal, the current Working Group was formed. The guidelines have been written by leading Canadian experts, and extensively reviewed from both a medical and legal standpoint. They are based on current best knowledge and best practice, and have been endorsed by eight national organizations: the Canadian Association of Chiefs of Police, the Canadian Institute of Child Health, the Canadian Nurses Association, the Canadian Public Health Association, Chief Coroners and Medical Examiners of Canada, the Child Welfare League of Canada, The College of Family Physicians of Canada and The Saskatchewan Prevention Institute. The characteristic findings of AHT include subdural hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhages and brain injury, particularly diffuse axonal injury, but these may not all be present. External signs of head trauma such as swelling, bruises and skull fractures are sometimes present. There may be signs of trauma elsewhere, such as bruises, and rib or long bone fractures. Since 1999, preference has been to move away from the term SBS to inflicted head trauma or AHT, recognizing that mechanisms other than shaking may be involved (eg, impact) and that shaking injuries have been documented in older children and even adults. Cases of abusive head injury, although infrequent, are of great clinical significance, because a large proportion of them result in death or permanent neurological deficits. There were 51 cases of confirmed head injury secondary to suspected child maltreatment (abuse or neglect) reported through the Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program in 2006 (2). The median age at presentation was five months and two-thirds were diagnosed as SBS. Mortality and morbidity were significant; in cases in which the outcome was known at time of discharge, 7% had died and 40% had neurological sequelae. The child, family and wider society also pay a price. In an earlier study (3), physicians at 11 tertiary care paediatric hospitals in Canada confirmed physical harm in 364 infants in a review of SBS cases reported to child protection teams over a 10-year period between 1988 and 1998. It could be argued that these statistics represent only the tip of the iceberg. The presentation of abusive head injury may be nonspecific without external evidence of injury and cases may be missed (4). Less severe cases of abusive head injury may not be brought to the attention of medical providers and, even when they are, they may not be recognized. There may be a failure by professionals to report suspected child abuse. Unfortunately, intervention for AHT largely occurs after maltreatment has already taken place. Primary prevention is clearly preferable, and we now know much about the precipitants of AHT (5,6). A recent report (7) targeting new parents during their stay on maternity wards described a prevention program in which the incidence of SBS was reduced by almost one-half. British Columbia has just initiated the evaluation of a province-wide implementation of The Period of PURPLE Crying prevention program that approaches prevention through a ‘three-dose’ strategy of providing new parents with an understanding of the frustrating properties of normal crying and the dangers of shaking while in maternity wards, reinforcing the message through public health home visitors, and a media campaign. The goal is to bring about a cultural change in the societal approach to infant crying and SBS risk (8). Such studies are laying the groundwork for the next important step, the development of a Canadian National AHT Prevention Strategy through the Child and Youth Maltreatment Section of the Canadian Paediatric Society in collaboration with its partners.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,688
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,071
Tête enseignante GPT0,350
Écart entre enseignants0,278 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2008
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetChild Abuse and Related TraumaTravaux en français237 207