The Evaluation of School Readiness for 5-8 Years Old Children - Cognitive, Social - Emotional, and Motor Coordination and Physical Health Perspectives
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT Although school readiness is a controversial term in the literature, we intend to propose a topic, which reflects an image of this concept, but also the necessity of the initiating a research in Romania, at the local level of the city Sibiu - study that can be extended at the national level. The concept of school readiness is analyzed from the perspectives of the studies and researches on the following levels: early education and schooling, the kindergarten - elementary school transition and different approaches in the literature of the concept. The conclusions purpose a research project, regarding the evaluation of school readiness from three points of view: the cognitive, the social - emotional and the motor and physical health. The educational system in Romania is under reform and the society is very dynamic, so we consider opportune a scientific foundation of school readiness in our country. KEYWORDS: school readiness, early education, preschool competences, kindergarten - family -child - school partnership. EARLY EDUCATION AND SCHOOLING - THE KINDERGARTEN - ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TRANSITION Early education can make the difference in child development and in competence acquisitions in the academic, economic and social arenas (Lunenburg, 2000). Lunenburg (2000) refers to studies which reflect the following aspects of the early education: attending for two years a preschool program can improve children's school readiness, early scholastic achievement and school competence (such as lower grade retention and special education placement) (Barnett, 1992; Haskins, 1989; Hubbell, 1983; McKey et al., 1985; Reynolds, 1995; White, 1985). Another aspect refers to the long-term implications of the early education: it reduced school dropout rates and increased employment (Beruetta-Clement, Schweinhart, Barnett, Epstein & Weikart, 1984; Reynolds, 1994; Schweinhart, Barnes & Weikart, 1993). Schooling is an international issue regarding the age of school entry, but also regarding the school characteristics, the transition kindergarten - elementary school and the acquisitions, skills and preschool competences of the children (Griebel, 2004). Griebel (2004) refers to studies from Canada, United States, Australia, European Countries that reflect the specificity of the educational systems (http://test.edfac.unimelb.edu.au, Margetts, 2002; Yeboah, 2002). Griebel and Niesel (2004) develop a transition theory, which takes into consideration the child - as an active subject of his own development together with his environment. This theory emphasizes the surpassing of the challenges, includes the life long learning in a social context and explains the transition for both child and family. According to Griebel (2004) the kindergarten- school transition brings about changes in three ways: individually, relationally, and environmentally. From these three levels there may occur discontinuities in the child's life experiences. Because the adaptation process must be done quickly and the learning processes are seen as developmental stimuli; Griebel calls these adaptability requirements development tasks (Griebel, 2004, Griebel & Niesel 2004), term which has been introduced by Erikson. For Havighurst (Sassu, 2006), development represents the achievement of several development tasks in different stages of life. These tasks may be provided: by the completion of different biological processes: learning to walk, by the social system: learning to read, taking up some civic responsibilities, even by the individual starting from their own system of values and aspirations: choosing a career. Considering the three levels mentioned above - individual, relational and developmental, the development tasks will look like this (Griebel, 2004) and they are appropriate in the schooling context: 1. For the individual level: a. identity change: from pre-school child to school child; b. facing strong emotions: happiness, curiosity, pride, as well as insecurity, fear; c. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».