Civil War Wests: Testing the Limits of the United States ed. by Adam Arenson and Andrew R. Graybill (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Civil War Wests: Testing the Limits of the United States ed. by Adam Arenson and Andrew R. Graybill Michael Frawley Civil War Wests: Testing the Limits of the United States. Edited by Adam Arenson and Andrew R. Graybill. ( Oakland: University of California Press, 2015. Pp. 330. Illustrations, maps, notes, bibliography, index.) Traditionally, when people discuss the West during the Civil War, they are talking of the Mississippi River Valley or the campaigns in Tennessee, Georgia, and the Carolinas. Anything that happened across the Mississippi River was nothing more than a sideshow, with little impact on either the war or Reconstruction. That is simply not true according to the collection of essays in Civil War Wests: Testing the Limits of the United States, edited by Adam Arenson and Andrew G. Graybill. Broken into three sections, these twelve essays explore the war and its aftermath through the lens of the frontier. Part one deals with the “Borderlands in Conflict.” James Jewell, Megan Kate Nelson, Lance Blyth, and Diane Burke all contributed essays dealing with the multi-faceted conflict in the West. The section begins with a review of the efforts of Confederate sympathizers on Vancouver Island, next moves to the Confederate military campaign in New Mexico, then to campaigns against various Indian tribes by Union forces, and finally wraps up with a study of the forced evacuation of southwest Missouri by [End Page 226] Union officials. Taken altogether, these essays show how far the conflict of the Civil War spread and how varied it could be when compared with the traditional view of the armies and politics generally discussed when studying the war. The second part of the book explores how the war ended in the West and the echoes of the conflict across the region. This section begins with an essay by Nicholas Guyatt on a plan to resettle freed slaves in Mexico. Gregory Downs reviews the problems the federal government had with dealing with the competing interests of life in Texas. Next, William Deverell explores how the West served as an escape from the war for those ravaged by its violence. Finally, the section concludes with a picture, literally, of the last major Indian treaty signed by the federal government, by Martha Sandweiss. Taken altogether, this section shows how the war in the West did not end as neatly and cleanly as it did in the East. The final section deals with the meaning of Reconstruction in the West. Definitions of citizenship changed on the frontier as newly freed slaves, Indians, women, and immigrants all tried to carve out a place in postwar America. Essays by Joshua Paddison, Virginia Scharff, Fay Yarbrough, and Stephen Kantrowitz attempt to show that the conflicts in the West shaped the country as a whole. Reconstruction and the constitutional amendments passed during this time opened the door not just for freedpeople, but for others as well. These essays show the shifting situation on the frontier and dealt with everything from voting rights and citizenship, to women’s suffrage, the place of freedpeople as part of Indian nations, and finally clothing as a symbol of modern America. In reality, a review cannot do justice to a work such as this one. The wide variety of ideas put forward by so many thorough researchers shows us just how important the West is to our understanding of the Civil War and Reconstruction. After the war, the entire country looked to the West as the next great adventure, a West, as these authors explained, that was shaped by the experiences of conflict and Reconstruction. This works helps to reorient our view. As Steven Hahn explains in the epilogue, “We may, that is, be able to look at the unfolding of U.S. history as much from West to East and South to North as from East to West and North to South, interrogating centers and peripheries as well as nations and regions” (272). Michael Frawley University of Texas of the Permian Basin Copyright © 2015 The Texas State Historical Association
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».