The World Congress of Herpetology and Animal Conservation: excerpts from the 6th World Congress
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The World Congress of Herpetology (WCH, http://www.worldcongressofherpetology.org/) is a relatively young organization as far as august herpetological societies go. It was formed in 1982, the year of the 25th meeting of the Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (founded in 1958), which itself is a relative youngster when compared to organizations such as the American Society for Ichthyology and Herpetology (founded in 1913) or Die Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde e. V. (originally founded in 1918 under a different name). Despite its youth, the WCH has accomplished much during its relatively short existence. Arguably the greatest accomplishment of the WCH was to provide the venue at the first meeting of the Congress, held in 1989 at Canterbury, UK, where numerous amphibian biologists shared tales of enigmatic declines and disappearances of amphibian study species. Undoubtedly these exchanges sparked the formation of the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force, providing impetus for the establishment of IUCN's Global Amphibian Assessment. This assessment, along with other research, in turn confirmed that amphibians are declining at a global scale and are more threatened than any other vertebrate class comprehensively assessed to date (Houlahan et al., 2000; Stuart et al., 2004). The WCH has adopted a non-confrontational role as a global representative of the science of herpetology. The organization takes in no membership fees, is only associated with a herpetological publication (Herpetological Conservation and Biology, an open access journal) rather than publishing one directly and seeks to avoid any form of competition with national or supranational herpetological societies. As such, the WCH exists to ‘promote international interest, collaboration and co-operation in herpetology’. To date the WCH has held six international congresses (1989, Canterbury, UK; 1993, Adelaide, Australia; 1997, Prague, Czech Republic; 2001, Bentota, Sri Lanka; 2005, Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa; 2008, Manaus, Brazil) and the next WCH, scheduled for 2012, will be held at Vancouver, Canada. This meeting will be held concurrently with the joint meetings of North America's three largest herpetological societies, ensuring the largest aggregation of herpetologists the world has ever seen. The stated mission of the WCH is to ‘promote herpetological research, education and conservation, by facilitating communication between individuals, societies and other organizations engaged in the study of amphibians and reptiles.’ To do this, international congresses are held every 3–5 years, and these have consistently hosted a large number of symposia addressing various aspects of herpetological conservation. For example, one of six rooms of the 6-day, 5th World Congress was allocated to amphibian conservation, reptile conservation or a workshop on applying the principles of CITES. The numbers of sessions devoted to herpetological conservation are on the rise: 36% of the sessions at the 2008 meeting in Manaus dealt directly with the conservation of reptiles and amphibians and numerous talks in other sessions also dealt with conservation topics. Due to the decision not to publish a societal journal, conveying the consistent academic contribution to herpetological conservation made by the WCH to the interested public has not been done. As a step to rectifying this, Animal Conservation is publishing in this special issue a selection of papers representing three of the conservation symposia: Invasive reptiles and amphibians: Global perspectives and local solutions, Amphibian disease: where do we go from here? and Herpetology and conservation genetics. All of these symposia have things in common: the primarily quantitative nature of the topics (making them suitable for publication in Animal Conservation), the current relevance of the topics for conservation and the use of general principles applied with an understanding of the biology and conservation needs of amphibians and reptiles. Perhaps the most important issue highlighted by this supplement is the urgent need for conservation science to continue to assess where the issues lie in the world of herpetology and how to mitigate threats. A search of Web of Science (Science Citation Index Expanded) using the key words conservation and the primary vertebrate taxon, returned the following publication counts: amphibians 274, reptiles 157, birds 1367, mammals 680 and fish 549. These results suggest amphibians and reptiles are significantly under-researched in this respect. Encouragingly, there is evidence of a recent pulse of activity in herpetological conservation research: almost 90% of the amphibian research and over 80% of the reptile research revealed by our straw poll of Web of Science was done in the past decade. Here's hoping the numbers continue to rise over the course of this decade.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».