Book Review: Psychotherapy: Attachment Processes in Couple and Family Therapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Psychotherapy Attachment Processes in Couple and Family Therapy Susan M Johnson, Valerie E Whiffen, editors. New York: The Guilford Press; 2003.411 p. US$42.00. Reviewer rating: Excellent Attachment theory was developed by John Bowlby as a theoretical framework to understand enduring emotional bonds that individuals develop in relation to certain people. It is only within the past 15 years or so that attachment theory has been recognized as a clinically valuable way of understanding significant adult relationships. From this understanding came research that demonstrated the meaningful link between attachment security or insecurity and well-being or distress. This edited text presents a broad look at the benefits and relevance of using an attachment-based framework when working with couples and families, regardless of the clients' ages. Its chapters are self-contained articles written by -experts regarded as leaders in the areas of couples therapy, family therapy, and attachment theory. The text has 5 clear sections. Section 1 addresses the issue of why (and how) attachment theory is relevant for clinical practice with couples and families. Here, the authors point out the universal and evolutionary basis of attachment. They provide readers with a solid foundation in the assumptions underlying attachment theory, offering key definitions outlining secure and insecure forms of attachment, as well as a discussion of the nature of attachment and pair bonding in adults. Further, they put attachment theory into a context that challenges readers to think about the variations in human attachment that may occur over one's lifespan and across cultures. Section 2 introduces readers to clinical interventions that incorporate attachment theory into their model of treatment. Specifically, the authors discuss emotion-focused therapy (EFT) for distressed couples; the value of attachment theory in behavioural interventions; and the use of attachment theory in interventions with children, in adolescents suffering from depression, and in adoptive families. In Sections 3 and 4, the authors expand on the discussion of clinical interventions, using an attachment-based framework. Separate chapters cover intervention with infants and mothers, adolescents and parents, heterosexual and same-sex couples, and older adults. The authors cohesively incorporate the research and theory components of their chapters with clinical illustrations such as case examples, session-specific therapist-client dialogue, and specific interventions. This allows readers to consolidate what they have learned theoretically with what they may see in their daily clinical practice. The authors demonstrate that attachment theory may serve as a valuable guide to clinicians when working with specific clients such as sexual abuse survivors and their partners, individuals with chronic pain and their partners, and women suffering from postpartum depression. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,037 | 0,020 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».