PESTICIDE EXPOSURE AND DEMENTIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To The Editor: A 76-year-old Caucasian male presented with a 3-year history of progressive cognitive loss and gait disturbance. Prior medical history included hypertension and mitral valve prolapse. The patient self-reported short-term memory deficit, micrographia, and paraphasias with unintended words and reversing letters. His son confirmed that the patient had required increasing help with finances and had recent and significant diminution of his work productivity. In addition, the patient had developed physical complaints; he had difficulty fastening buttons and cuff links and getting up from sitting position, and his gait had become unsteady. At the request of his children, he stopped driving. He began isolating himself, finding it difficult to socialize because he “misinterpreted what others said.” The patient had received a bachelor's degree from Dartmouth University and had become a successful real estate developer. He was an avid gardener and, for the previous 30 years, had spent at least 8 hours every day in his poorly ventilated greenhouse. He was keen on using multiple pesticides (including Sevin or Carbaryl, Sunspray oil, Proxo180SP, Orthene, Malathion, Kelthane, Dylox, Dursban, Dithane, Diaznon, Carbamate, and Chlordane) and never protected himself with use of mask, gown, or gloves, despite written warning on the containers. Indeed, his family commented on the putrid smell of the patient's clothes at dinnertime. After dinner, the patient would return to his greenhouse and refuse to bathe when he returned home at midnight. On physical examination, at the time of admission, his vital signs were within normal limits. Heart and lung examination were unremarkable. Mini-Mental State Examination score was 25 out of 30. Motor and sensory examination was normal. He had decreased rapid alternating movements bilaterally. His gait was narrow based with no arm swing. There was marked truncal instability with retropulsion. He was found to have minimal cogwheel rigidity, bradykinesia, and a stooped posture. He underwent neuropsychological testing. The performance corresponded to age-appropriate functioning. Memory recall, measured using the Bender recall, reflected the patient's impairment of short-term memory. There was evidence of memory loss for recent events such as forgetting telephone numbers, conversations, and events of the day. On the Wechsler-Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised subtests, immediate memory span was fair, as indicated using digits forward and backwards, and he had excellent abstract thinking, as indicated using similarities and interpretation of proverbs. Repeat neuropsychological evaluation, a year later, confirmed apraxia and significant errors in frontal system tasks with high levels of intrusion and perseverations; his fluency was at borderline level. The evaluation suggested dementia, with high premorbid function and education level. Laboratory tests were within normal limits. Spinal tap was negative. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, performed in April 1999, showed patchy increased signal intensity in mid pons. An electroencephalogram performed in June 1999 was unremarkable. A cerebral angiogram was negative. During the course of his 5-year illness, motor symptoms progressed more rapidly than cognitive losses. He became increasingly dependent, requiring assistance in activities of daily living. After the cerebral angiogram, in 1999, he suffered a grand mal seizure. Thereafter, he became increasingly lethargic and eventually virtually catatonic. On autopsy, the brain showed innumerable demyelinating foci affecting subcortical white matter and deeper layers of cerebral cortex of unknown etiology. There was no evidence of lesions characteristic of Alzheimer or Parkinson's disease or multiple sclerosis. (Figure 1) Luxol fast blue stain showing myelin pallor and lipid-laden macrophages. There was no evidence of lesions characteristic of Alzheimer's disease. More than 1,000 chemical compounds and biological agents are used around the world as insecticides. The controversy over whether neurobehavioral effects persist after recovery from organophosphate poisoning has continued for 30 years. There have been reports of deficits in memory and abstraction on test batteries. Workers who apply organophosphates but have not truly suffered poisoning episodes have shown subclinical neurobehavioral deficits.1 Little is known about the adverse effects of pesticides on the development of cognitive dysfunction. Case control data from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging show an association between occupational exposure to pesticides and dementia.2 The only other study to investigate this relationship is the Maastricht Aging Study, which showed occupational exposure to pesticides to be related to progressive worsening of cognitive testing in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses.3 Gait impairment preceding cognitive impairment and progressing at a faster pace supports pesticide exposure as the likely etiology for the dementia in this elderly patient. As dementing illnesses receive more attention in our aging society, it would be beneficial to increase consumer awareness of the risks of pesticide use in leisure activities such as gardening.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».