The Helicopsychidae, a caddisfly family new to British Columbia (Insecta: Trichoptera)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Helicopsychidae is a small but distinctive family of the Trichoptera containing 10 genera (Morse 2007). It is found in most faunal regions around the world (Wiggins 1996a). The cosmopolitan genus Helicopsyche consists of about 238 described species (Morse 2007) and is the sole North American genus in the family. Although this genus is mostly tropical in distribution, it contains five known species north of Mexico (Morse 2007). Helicopsyche borealis (Hagen) is the only species ranging north into Canada. Despite its name, it is not a typical transcontinental boreal species but is only distributed northerly relative to other species in the genus. It is widespread and common over much of North America (Wiggins 1996a) but has not been recorded from the Yukon (Wiggins and Parker 1999) or previously in British Columbia (BC) (Nimmo and Scudder 1978, 1983). It prefers clear, fast-flowing streams, but also inhabits the littoral zone of lakes (Wiggins 1996a, Schmid 1998) and is among the caddisflies most tolerant of high water temperatures (Wiggins 1996a), perhaps a reflection of the tropical origin of the genus (Williams et al. 1983). The most striking feature of almost all species in the family is the larval case, which, finely built of sand grains and silk, strongly resembles a tightly coiled snail shell. Indeed, H. borealis was originally described as a gastropod (Lea 1834). This distinctive, compact and consolidated case probably is an adaptation for a larval life in beds of gravel and stones (Williams et al. 1983, Wiggins 1996a). The larvae feed on diatoms and plant detritus on the surfaces of the rocks or in the spaces between them (Williams et al. 1983). This note records the first specimens of H. borealis and the family Helicopsychidae from BC. The main material examined was collected by Gina Roberts from the San Jose River, 2.4 km east of its mouth in Williams Lake (52o05’50”N x 121o59’52”W) on 9 November 1998. The water at the collection site was up to 50 cm deep and flowed at about 0.3 to 0.5 m/sec. During spring run-off, the river’s water level rises 1 to 1.5 m. Larvae were abundant; over the 3 or 4 m of river examined, there were several hundred larvae per square decimetre. The specimens, about 100 in total, are housed in three ethanol lots in the Royal British Columbia Museum (ENT001000978, 79, 80). In addition, two small collections of specimens from the Chilcotin River were deposited as vouchers at the Royal BC Museum as part of Environment Canada’s Fraser River Action Plan. Although the larval specimens were labeled and identified to family in the project, the Helicopsychidae was not listed in the benthic invertebrate report describing the collections and their analysis (Rosenberg et al. 1999). The data for the two sites on the Chilcotin River are: 52o12’41”N x 123o50’50”W, 21.x. 1994, 3040’ asl, T.B. Reynoldson; and 52o18’52”N x 123o58’35”W, 22.x.1994, 3180’ asl, T.B. Reynoldson. These sites are northwest of Redstone between Puntzi Creek and Chilcotin Lake.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».