The Impact of Cross-Cultural Contact on Value and Identity: A Comparative Study of Chinese Students in China and in the U.S.A.
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This study explores relationships between cultural contact and value change. Surveys were conducted to compare students having cross-cultural contact (Chinese students in the US, N=107) with students without contact (Chinese students in China, N = 185) on value scores. The Chinese Value Survey (CCC, 1987) was used as the instrument for observing value differences between these two samples. Cross-cultural contact was found to be associated with value change among Chinese students. However. changes occurred in opposite directions. Students with contact thought the value of cultural conservation was less important than those without contact. Those staying in the U.S. over two years viewed cultural conservation as less important than those in the U.S. less than two years. Surprisingly, students with contact viewed the values of group integration and selfprotection as more important than students without contact. In-depth interviews (N=25) among Chinese students in the U.S. provided further interpretations, suggesting that cross-cultural contact can result in changes - some values decrease their significance among Chinese students for cultural adjustment while others increase their importance for cultural identity. The world has become a global village in which members of different cultures find themselves face-to-face. Consequently, diverse cultural value systems come into contact. Cultural values have been of lasting interest to scholars in multiple disciplines; however, it is the accelerated globalization that has turned such classic topics as value clash and cultural identity into timely issues. While most cross-cultural studies compared value differences with peoples from distinctive cultures (Chung, Walkey and Bemak 1997; Hofstede 1980; Hui 1990; Hus 1981; Stipek 1998; Ting-Toomey 1988; Triandis, Brislin and Hui 1988), the current study utilized samples from the same cultural tradition but with different interaction contexts; i.e., Chinese students in China and Chinese students in the U.S. There has been an increasing realization that cultural values of international students may experience change from their continuous interaction with the host culture and society (Brislin, 1981; Furnham, 1988; Hull, 1978; Kim and Ruben, 1988; Searle and Ward, 1990). According to these studies, those who have adapted their cultural values to new cultural environments may function better in the host society. Other researchers emphasize the aspect of cultural conflict. They have demonstrated that cultural value differences and conflicts broadly exist among immigrant groups (Adler, 1975; Casimir and Keats, 1996; Gudykunst and Kim, 1984; Triandis, 1977). The complexity of cross-cultural interaction has been especially discussed between eastern and western value systems (Bond 1988; Bond and Hwang, 1986; Church, 1982; Hui, 1990; Hall, 1976; Smith, 1994; Ting-Toomey, 1988; Triandis, Brislin and Hui, 1988). The significant impact of cultural contact on racial and ethnic relations has received continuing attention (Feagin, 1991; Kitano, 1974; Marger, 1994; Thomas and Hughes, 1986; Williams, 1977; Yetman, 1985). Yet many studies have focused on the effects of ethnocentrism and racial discrimination on cultural values and ethnic identity (Chen, 1981; Chen and Yang, 1986; De Vos, 1990; Paige, 1990; Triandis, 1990). The most recent research on acculturation processes contributes greatly to the understanding of Chinese students in western societies, such as Australia (Hird, 1997; Da, 1998), Canada (McCrea et al., 1998), and the U.S. (Ying and Liese, 1994; Zhang and Rentz, 1996). The current research investigates the process of cross-cultural contact and its effects on value change and cultural identity. In this regard, early literature states that an effective intercultural communication depends on the degree of information exchange and mutual understanding between guest and host cultures (Martin, 1984). Through the stress-adaptation-growth process of communication, individuals go beyond the cognitive, affective, and behavioral limits of their original culture and eventually become intercultural (Kim and Ruben, 1988). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle