Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Hypertext and hypermedia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the 16th ACM Conference on Hypertext and - Hypertext'05. The ACM Hypertext Conference is the foremost international conference on hypertext and It brings together scholars, researchers and practitioners from a diverse array of disciplines creating a forum that promotes the exchange of ideas and opinions.Following in the footsteps of early hypertext pioneers, the conference invited original contributions on concepts, methodologies and tools for supporting knowledge workers. Knowledge workers add value by processing existing information to create knowledge that can be used to define and solve problems within organizations. In achieving their objectives they continuously search, gather, analyze, associate, compare and organize structures. Essential to the work of knowledge workers is also their ability to integrate concepts and epistemologies from different disciplines. The question of how hypertext can support these activities was at the heart of this year's conference.In order to make these areas of interests explicit and to emphasize the multidisciplinary tradition of ACM Hypertext, we organized the conference around the notion of themes. This year we have broadened the scope of the conference by adding new themes that focus on vital activities of knowledge workers: Hypermedia and information retrieval, Collaborative hypermedia, Hypermedia engineering and Time and synchronization in hypermedia. Two field experts were given the role of theme chairs, with the responsibility of soliciting submissions in their themes, supervising the reviewing process as well as representing and discussing their corresponding theme during program committee meeting. In an attempt to build bridges to new fields this year we tried to have at least one theme chair not from within the hypertext community. This experiment worked well and gave the hypertext community the opportunity to cooperate with a number of established researchers in those fields. We hope that future conferences will draw on this experience and continue the efforts of establishing connections to new and promising domains. We would like to thank all theme chairs for their hard work and creative suggestions in developing the program.Following the successful practice of previous years, we invited also submissions in hypertext form. Hypertexts were reviewed according to review criteria that were developed by Simon Buckingham Shum during last year's conference and were approved by the hypertext chair, Mark Bernstein.The call for papers was developed by the conference's general and program chair, along with valuable feedback from SIGWEB. The call attracted 71 full-length papers, 53 short papers and 2 hypertext submissions from Asia, Canada, Europe and the United States. To ensure highest quality, each submission underwent a rigorous review process and was extensively discussed at the program committee meeting. To champion the conference's multidisciplinary nature, we tried to have a balanced representation of all themes in the program. The program committee accepted 45 submissions (22 full papers, 22 short papers and 1 hypertext submission) that cover a broad spectrum of topics, including Hypermedia in digital libraries, Hypermedia systems and structures, Adaptive and adaptable hypermedia, Ubiquitous and physical hypermedia as well as Literary hypermedia and Hypermedia in the humanities.We also strongly encouraged poster, demonstration and doctoral consortium submissions that proved to be excellent vehicles for reporting new and exciting work to the community. For the doctoral consortium in particular, we supported the dialog between younger and established of the community.In addition, the program includes an opening keynote by Monika Henzinger, Google Inc., on Hyperlink Analysis on the World Wide Web and a closing keynote by Uffe K. Wiil, the Maersk MC-Kinney Moller Institute, on Hypermedia Technology for Knowledge Workers: A Vision of the Future.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».