MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1785883686 · doi:10.1111/hdi.12038

The <scp>A</scp>rgentine <scp>S</scp>ociety of <scp>N</scp>ephrology and the history of end‐stage renal disease in <scp>A</scp>rgentina

2013· article· en· W1785883686 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Carlos Luis Blanco, Cristina Vallvé

Notice bibliographique

RevueHemodialysis International · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNephrologyMedicineInternal medicineHemodialysisDialysisKidney diseaseFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The first hemodialysis in Argentina was performed in a private clinic by Dr Alfonso Guinazu of the University of Buenos Aires in 1955 using a Kolff-Brigham artificial kidney built locally. The Instituto Lanari in Buenos Aires was established in 1957 and in June of that year performed the first kidney transplant in the country and in April of the following year, having established a Nephrology and Dialysis Service, became the first public hospital in Argentina to do hemodialysis. As a result, several influential Argentinian physicians who were interested in kidney disease attended the First International Congress of Nephrology in Evian, France in 1960. The Argentine Society of Nephrology (SAN) was founded in 1960 and celebrated its 50th anniversary two years ago. The Society is well recognized both inside the Latin-American nephrology community and internationally. The first Argentine Congress of Nephrology was held in 1970, and in 1999, the 15th World Congress of Nephrology was held in Buenos Aires in conjunction with the society's Annual Congress, attracting more than 5000 attendees. Each year the Society develops both a Hemodialysis Course designed to educate and update the country's nephrologists and a similar Hemodialysis Course for nephrology nurses. Experience with these courses helps in selection of topics for the Argentine Congresses of Nephrology that are held every two years. In 2013, the 18th Argentine Congress of Nephrology and the 11th Argentine Congress for Nephrology Nurses will be held in conjunction with the 6th Congress of The International Society for Hemodialysis in Buenos Aires from September 11th to September 14th. In addition, articles are published and presentations about dialysis and transplantation by Argentinian physicians are given every year in Argentina, South America and worldwide. Chronic kidney disease is a major problem in Argentina just as it is elsewhere in the world and the principal causes are hypertension and diabetes. The Department of Health's National Survey of Factors of Risk shows that that 34.8% of the population aged 18 years or older has hypertension, and that between 2005 and 2009, the incidence of diabetes increased from 8% to 9.6% and that of obesity increased from 14.6% to 18.0% of the adult population. In addition, the general population is aging and this also predisposes to chronic kidney disease. Thus, a significant number of the population is at risk of developing kidney disease. While the reported incidence of the CKD has doubled in the last 10 years, there are many patients in the early stages that are undiagnosed and untreated. One recent national report suggests that about 12% of the adult population have some degree of renal disease. From 2004 onward, following an agreement between the SAN and the national agency coordinating transplantation, the Argentine Record of Chronic Dialysis was established. This is published annually on the Web page of the Society in both Spanish and English, and is available to nephrologists worldwide. In 2010, there were 6155 new dialysis patients and 25 patients whose first treatment was a kidney transplant, an overall incidence rate of 154.5 patients per million population (pmp), an increase of 1.36% over 2009. According to the Argentine Record of Chronic Dialysis, as of 2010, there were some 26,000 patient on dialysis, of whom 96% were on center hemodialysis and 4% were on peritoneal dialysis. Home hemodialysis was almost nonexistent. Preliminary data for 2012 suggest there are now 27,577 patients on dialysis, with 95% on center hemodialysis and 5% on peritoneal dialysis. Ninety percent of peritoneal dialysis patients are treated by continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis and the remainder by continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis. The annual increase in prevalent patients was between 6% and 8% for many years, but in the last four years, this growth seems to have weakened to about 3%. The recent national prevalence rate is 632 patients pmp. The results of dialysis for the treatment of end-stage renal disease are comparable to those of many other centers around the world. In terms of transplantation, in 2012, there was a total of 1067 kidney transplants consisting of 990 kidney transplants, 63 kidney and pancreas transplants, 11 kidney and liver transplants, and 3 kidney and heart transplants. There are important regional differences in the availability of kidney transplants in various regions of the country. The current waiting list has 5999 patients waiting for a kidney, 106 waiting for a kidney and pancreas, 23 waiting for a kidney and a liver, and 1 waiting for a kidney and a heart. Early recognition and treatment of renal disease may anticipate or delay its progression to more serious renal failure and its complications, particularly cardiovascular disease. Even so, the majority of the patients with renal disease in Argentina are not diagnosed until they present with symptoms of uremia. Consequently, there is a pressing need to educate physicians generally about the recognition and management of all stages of this disease in order to improve patient care and quality of life. The SAN actively collaborates with other national organizations that participate in improving the management of patients suffering from all chronic diseases. We hope to see many of you at the joint meeting of the International Society for Hemodialysis and the Argentine Congress of Nephrology and Congress for Nephrology Nurses in Buenos Aires from September 11th to September 14th.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,022
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,052

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,232
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHemodialysis International→Même sujetOrgan Donation and Transplantation→Travaux en français237 207→