MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W178633692

Finnish Lyric Diction

2010· article· en· W178633692 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Tellervo Kähärä

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Singing · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueResearch in Social Sciences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDictionChoirSymphonyMusicalOperaLinguisticsSingingMusical notationLiteratureHistoryArtVisual artsPoetryPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

(ProQuest: ... denotes formulae omitted.) IN RECENT DECADES, Finnish music (in particular symphonies) has found its way into the cognizance of international audiences, due largely to a number of talented, young conductors who have taken it upon themselves to introduce it into their music programs. But Finnish music is not just the symphonies of Jean Sibelius; indeed, there is a plethora of different genres waiting to be introduced to the world. One of these is vocal music, encompassing art songs as well as choral music and opera. Songs have words; therefore, it is a necessity for those singers, voice pedagogues, and choir directors who wish to include Finnish vocal music in their programs to have a practical knowledge of the Finnish language, or at least its basic phonology. That already will enable them to delve into this treasure trove of lesser known musical gems. The features for mastering Finnish lyric diction will be presented in this article, first through an introduction to each necessary aspect of Finnish phonology, and second, through direct application to songs, with constant reference to the IPA (International Phonetic Alphabet). It is hoped that this will be of help, and will inspire interest in Finnish vocal repertoire. GENERAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FINNISH LANGUAGE Finnish is a non-Indo-European language of noteworthy linguistic and musical interest. As a national language of Finland, it is used today by some six million people, among them many world renowned composers, poets, singers, pianists, violinists, conductors, choir directors, and other musicians who have proven themselves globally to be experts in their fields of music. Other than in Finland itself, Finnish is spoken in several other countries, especially in those of nearest proximity to Finland: Sweden, Norway, Estonia, and the province of Karelia in Russia. Due to mass migrations at certain points in Finnish history, Finnish nationals have also settled in such far away places as the USA, Canada, and Australia, with vibrant communities intent on preserving their Finnish culture still in existence. Linguistically Finnish belongs to the Finno-Ugric family of languages, with Estonian and Hungarian the nearest relatives, and Turkish, along with many minor groups of the Altaic family, as a distant linguistic relative. When compared with Indo-European languages, the Finnish language differs in a number of ways. Some of the most distinct differences are outlined here. In Finnish there are no articles before nouns, no pronouns distinguishing gender, just one third person singular (han), no prepositions, but several postpositions and suffixes which, when added to words, make them appear very long. There is no future tense. The accent is always on the first syllable; intonation does not rise in interrogative sentences; a strict system of quantity of length is observed with both vowels and consonants; with vowels there is a special system called vowel harmony, and with consonants, consonant gradation. Finnish is commonly known as a phonetic language, particularly singable and quite easy to pronounce, as each letter of the alphabet represents only one sound, which, even if not always pronounced the same way by individuals, will usually be understood. The letters correspond efficiently with most of the IPA symbols. The original Finnish alphabet consists of twenty-one letters: a, d, e, g, h, i, j, k, l, m, n, o, p, r, s, t, u, v/w, y, a [ae], and o [o]. Original in this context, means the primary Finnish alphabet, used with authentic Finnish vocabulary. Since the 1940s, as Finland has continued to become more globally connected, the letters b, c, f, q, x, z, and a have become integral components of what is now the basic Finnish alphabet. Their addition facilitates the writing of loan words from other languages, names of foreign businesses, and non-Finnish names of individuals. There are no silent letters in Finnish. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: Autre
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,329
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,957

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0050,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,3290,296

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,404
Écart entre enseignants0,377 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of SingingMême sujetResearch in Social SciencesTravaux en français237 207