MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1796426789

A Mennonite-Christian View of Suffering: The Case of Russian Mennonites in the 1930s and 1940s

2003· review· en· W1796426789 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Harry Loewen

Notice bibliographique

Revue˜The œMennonite quarterly review · 2003
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAgriculture and Farm Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAnabaptistsHistoryForgivenessReligious studiesTheologyPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract: Historian C. Henry Smith wrote: Never since the days of the [Anabaptist] martyrs have the Mennonites suffered as much as during the twentieth century in Russia. This essay focuses on the suffering of Mennonites in the Soviet Union during the 1930s and 1940s, including their loss of family members and possessions at the hands of the Soviets, their flight west in the winter of 1943, the forcible repatriation of thousands at the end of World War II and their exile to the northern and eastern regions of Siberia. The essay asks questions about personal and corporate forgiveness and argues that Mennonites need to understand their history to make sense of their suffering. Mennonite suffering in the twentieth century adds an important and deeper dimension to Bender's Anabaptist Vision and becomes a significant part of Mennonite identity. ********** Shakespeare's King Lear, rejected by his family and exposed to the fury of the natural elements, cries out in near-despair: am a man more sinn'd against than sinning. (1) In his suffering King Lear admits that he has sinned against his daughters, especially his youngest, but on balance, he feels that the sins of two of his daughters against him were greater than his sins against them. His suffering was out of proportion to his guilt. The Russian Mennonites in the 1930s and 1940s probably did not think of King Lear in their suffering, but the more thoughtful among them have also asked whether they deserved the pain they had to endure. Some believed that their suffering was God's punishment for their sins, including failings toward Russian and Ukrainian citizens, especially prior to the Revolution of 1917, when the Mennonite world was still intact and Mennonites generally enjoyed a better material existence than their peasant neighbors. I often heard my mother and grandmother ask, Kinder, wie haben wir das alles verdient? (Children, how have we deserved all this?) But many Russian Mennonites during this period felt that, no matter what wrongs they had committed in the land to which they had come one hundred and fifty years before, the suffering they now endured at the hands of the Soviets was out of proportion to their past failings. Historian C. Henry Smith was no doubt correct when he wrote: Never since the days of the [Anabaptist] martyrs have the Mennonites suffered as much as during the twentieth century in Russia. (2) During the sixteenth century about 4000 Anabaptists were martyred because of their faith. In the mid-twentieth century many more thousands of Russian Mennonites--the exact number is not known-suffered and died directly and indirectly at the hands of the Soviets. Many of them lie buried in unmarked graves. (3) Of course, earlier Russian Mennonites also suffered much. However, the history of Russian Mennonites shows a progression in the intensity of their suffering. The 18,000 Mennonites who left Russia in the 1870s and 1880s endured many hardships: they lost their homes, they were dislocated, they embarked on hazardous journeys across the ocean and they endured difficult pioneering years in Canada and the United States. They were the first to leave Russia, thus escaping the fate of later Soviet Mennonites. The 21,000 Mennonites who left Soviet Russia in the 1920s suffered greatly during the first decades of the Soviet regime. They experienced the Communist Revolution of 1917 and the civil war that followed; they went hungry in the early 1920s; they suffered at the hands of Nestor Makhno (1889-1934) and other anarchists; many were slaughtered by the bandits and their homes were destroyed; they lost their farms and other possessions to the Soviet state; they were forced into collectivization; and in the end, seeing no way out, they fled Soviet Russia to make new beginnings in Canada, Brazil and Paraguay. Fortunately, both of these groups came to North and South America with their families more or less intact and with their faith and culture generally preserved. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Autre devis · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,987
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,758

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeAutre devis
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revue˜The œMennonite quarterly reviewMême sujetAgriculture and Farm SafetyTravaux en français237 207