MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W17969196 · doi:10.1002/lt.21234

Book review: Inside edge

2002· article· en· W17969196 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Richard H. Glazier

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiquePrimary Care and Health Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésComputer scienceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionData scienceWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligence

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Doctors on the edge: general practitioners, health and learning in the inner city Linden West London: Free Association Books; 2001 240 pp US$55 (cloth) ISBN 1-85343-522-8 US$25 (paper) ISBN 1-85343-522-8 As a topic, the work of British inner- city doctors at first seemed exotic to me. Could a book about reforms to the National Health Service and the conditions of general practice in London resonate with Canadian doctors? What about the method of inquiry, in-depth “auto/biographical” research based on interviews and discussions with 25 general practitioners in the inner city? As it turned out, Doctors on the Edge struck very close to home. Many of its themes will resonate with physicians in Canada: professional isolation, conflict with partners and employees, demanding patients, long hours of work, financial pressures, difficulty accessing community resources and working with other disciplines, poor treatment at the hands of the medical hierarchy and of health-system bureaucrats, the struggle to balance roles at work and at home, marital problems, emotional distress, difficulty asking for help and discrimination. There are also stories of dedication, overcoming obstacles, coping under harsh circumstances, reaching out and striving to improve. Indeed, remarkably little in this book is specific to inner-city London or even to general practice, while there is much that illuminates problematic issues fundamental to the modern physician's role. These issues start with the medical curriculum and its preference for linear, reductionist thinking over lateral thinking and creativity, factual learning over building relationships, and rational science over emotional expression. Once in practice, physicians are faced with vague symptoms, irrational demands for tests and therapies, uncertainty in diagnosis and prognosis and the need to establish and manage long-standing relationships with patients, colleagues and employees. None of these challenges will have been given much attention in medical school. Physicians in solo practice have autonomy but may find themselves isolated from their colleagues and at risk of falling behind in the rapid expansion of medical knowledge. Some in group practice will have to take on managerial roles for which they may be poorly prepared. Continuing education has limited appeal to many who need it, and the professional and financial pressures of daily practice militate against taking sufficient time off for new learning. The physician's role has a subtext: superiority, emotional distance, the priority of work over personal and family issues, and invincibility. In a culture of impossibly high expectations, physicians may spend inordinate time and effort trying to meet unrealistic standards. Together with the sacrifice of family and recreational time, this can lead to fatigue, despair, burnout, damaged relationships and ill health. Valuing inner strength, autonomy and the authority of physicians, the culture of medicine poses a barrier to seeking help, especially for adjustment and emotional difficulties. Physicians may be especially reluctant to take on a patient role when that role is seen as one of inferiority and submission. Women physicians are faced with the same set of work expectations as their male colleagues, but also with family and household responsibilities, setting the scene for stress, guilt and a feeling of being torn between two sets of unattainable goals. Linden West began this five-year project with an interest in educational reforms and their impact on inner-city physicians. In Britain, peer education, the formation of self-directed learning groups and audits by medical authorities held the potential to improve practice but also to further marginalize certain physicians, especially women, those from Asia, and those in solo practice. As he listened to doctors' stories, West became interested in learning more about the broad issues in their practices and in their lives. Educational reforms were one aspect of changes taking place in the National Health Service. New standards for maintaining professional certification, the encouragement of group practices and altered practice arrangements and funding formulas were having an impact on British general practitioners, just as those issues are now affecting many Canadian family doctors. Although West deals with “learning in the city,” he also includes chapters on his method of auto/biographic research, the stress and boundary issues of daily practice, transcending career and personal crises, the struggles of women physicians, dealing with changing roles and uncertain beliefs, cultures of silence, performance and underperformance, the limited options and scapegoating of physicians from minority groups and the crisis of general practice. “The edge” of his title refers both to the marginalization of general practice within medicine, a crisis in which doctors are being pushed to extremes, and the cutting edge of new forms of reflective practice. This book is a strong reminder that stories form the basis of shared human experience. Those told here are candid, sometimes tragic or redemptive, but always authentic in tone and content. Humanist psychological interpretation is provided throughout, but the narrative remains faithful to the context of the author's developing relationships with his subjects. Medical culture is portrayed as deeply flawed in the ways it prevents physicians from connecting as people with their patients, dealing with distress and emotional difficulties, seeking and receiving help and building a supportive practice environment. The focus on marginalized doctors in a marginalized setting perhaps amplifies these issues, but it is not hard to apply that emphasis more generally to our profession. Who should read this book? The many people who plan and organize primary care services and who are now considering and implementing reforms would do well to heed the messages of this book. Practising physicians, especially those early in their careers or experiencing dissatisfaction, boredom, distress or burnout might gain insight into changes they could make in their professional and personal lives. Medical educators interested in aligning the undergraduate curriculum and residency training with the realities of medical practice can also gain valuable perspectives here. West offers no prescriptive answers on how to realign medicine with a more humanistic and interpersonal approach, but the necessity of doing so is clear. His study also makes plain the need to organize care delivery in ways that support individuals, enable them to seek help, promote improvements in practice and facilitate collaboration across disciplines. Richard H. Glazier Associate Professor Family & Community Medicine University of Toronto Staff Scientist Inner City Health Research Unit St. Michael's Hospital Toronto, Ont.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,198
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,662

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0050,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0070,004
Science ouverte0,0020,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1980,194

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,033
Tête enseignante GPT0,367
Écart entre enseignants0,334 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Même sujetPrimary Care and Health Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→