Engendering Transnational Foodways: A Case Study of Southern Sudanese Women in Brooks, Alberta
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
For countless women across time and space, the kitchen and the food work conducted within it have represented sites of simultaneous repression and celebration. Women's work in the kitchen. becomes undervalued in societies that place greater value on the financial responsibilities of a household than the nurturing (Engels 1972). In these contexts the kitchen becomes a space that limits women's social, economic and personal mobility (Devault 1991; Mclntosh and Zey 1998). However, scholars have also illuminated how a significant number of women understand the kitchen as a space for the creation of identity, love and creative expression (Abarca 2006; Adapon 2008; Avakian 1997, 2005; Counihan 2005, 2008). Due to the diverse meanings contained in the kitchen, women may utilize it in ways that represent multiple changing levels and degrees of freedom, self-awareness, subjectivity, and (Abarca 2006:19). It is therefore important to acknowledge the diversity of significances women encounter when working within this space. As such, this article contributes to feminist anthropological work analyzing the ways in which women use the kitchen, specifically foodways,1 as dynamic spaces for social, economic and personal mobility (Abarca 2006; Avakian 1997, 2005; Counihan 2005, 2008). Because of the ideological baggage that very often accompanies foodways, women who define foodways beyond their oppressive associations are embarking on acts of agency (Abarca 2006).In this article, I investigate the specific relationship between Southern Sudanese women and food. In particular, I use a case study of refugees in Brooks, Alberta, to explore how power relations are enacted within the global movement of people, products and ideas. As globalization facilitates the reconceptualization of boundaries, identities and existences, people often renegotiate their understandings of culture and tradition (Appadurai 1996; Hannerz 1996). Global consumer society creates new markets, demands and meanings for culture (in this case, food in particular), as local practices become embedded within global structures (Ferrero 2002; Long 2004; WiIk 2006). When people negotiate new modes of existence, categories of power blur and create new spaces of action where the relations between the dominant and the subordinated, the self and the other, must be reconfigured (Ferrero 2002:195). Southern Sudanese women in Brooks provide an example of these global processes as they take place within the daily foodways of women in rural Alberta.In relation to food practices, patriarchal ideologies simultaneously define and devalue the identities of Southern Sudanese women; yet, the women assert agency by manoeuvring within these ideologies and defining themselves outside them. Their movements are facilitated by the global interaction of people, food and meaning which encompass the experiences of Southern Sudanese women in Brooks. Specifically, in this article, I will investigate how women's openness to foreign food practices and their simultaneous development of cosmopolitan consciousness demonstrates acts of agency. For these women, cosmopolitanism is an orientation; it is a readiness and competence to engage in the unfamiliar undertaken within the realm of everyday embodied experience (Cheah and Robbins 1998). By engaging in this orientation, women make the foreign familiar and create belonging within diverse fields of cultural meaning. Southern Sudanese women's cosmopolitan foodways are a means of empowerment because first, they represent women's challenge to the liminality of their existence and, second, they facilitate a global awareness of culture that allows women to utilize their cultural capital to gain prestige among their peers as well as new resources to manage their daily lives. In creating belonging within the diversity that defines their experiences, Southern Sudanese women in Brooks show how daily food practices are used to navigate experiences of gender, ethnicity and power. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».