MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W181193075

Intercultural Communication Competency for International Educators

2012· article· en· W181193075 sur OpenAlex
Beverley Shaklee, Sydney A. Merz

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational schools journal · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Education and Multiculturalism
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCredentialPedagogyIntercultural competenceIntercultural communicationBachelorPresentation (obstetrics)International educationCompetence (human resources)Ethnic groupIntercultural learningPsychologySociologyPolitical scienceHigher educationMedicineSocial psychology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionSeveral months ago at the ECIS leadership conference in Vienna, Austria, a presentation was given on intercultural communication competence (ICC). During the presentation, participants discussed what they do in their schools to ensure the development of intercultural communication competence in their school setting.The answers were interesting and informative. Respondents indicated a very wide range of activities, including short-term orientations and day-long workshops for all staff and faculty to the far end of the continuum which was stated as 'we don't do enough'. Questioning further and probing for examples it became clear that, while there is strength in the development of ICC in some of our international schools, others are struggling to determine what, if anything, they should be doing.The following discussion of ICC is not to advocate for a single definition or set of strategies that should be used with international educators but rather to promote discourse at the campus, school or classroom level between and among educators who serve in international settings.Teachers recruited to international schoolsThe most predominant groups choosing to teach in international schools are from western nations, primarily Canada, United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand and the United States. Little is known about their language facility other than English, their ethnicity, their educational background, exceptionalities or socio-economic status (Shaklee, 2011). Little is known about their prior training in intercultural communication skills or their prior international experiences.Other than a bachelor's degree of some sort, some will have a credential to teach; some will have teaching experience in their current country; and some will come with no experience or credential in teaching whatsoever. What we do know is that they are generally eager, adventurous, curious, risk-takers who specifically target international schools with an eye for a career in teaching. We also know that some are children of international schools educators and/or third culture families who are most comfortable continuing to live and work in an international setting.Understanding the attributes and experiences of international educators is vital to understanding the effect that teachers have on international students (Shaklee & Baily, 2012). Though many westernized teacher education programs have recognized the emergence of globalization, most teacher education programs in the western world still prepare educators for the education within their native country (Levy, 2010). Thus, with heavy influence of the western world in international schools, it becomes vital that international educators develop and continue to understand the importance of ICC.As humans, it is part of our nature to distinguish similarities and differences among peoples. Lee (2007) found that 'understanding how difference is constructed, both within and across cultures, is one of the most important points for understanding self and others' (p 157). Hence, it is important to understand who one is before trying to understand another. This concept is critical for international educators, as many tend to migrate to international schools in which their culture is not the dominant culture of the students they teach or families they serve.Intercultural competence and researchIntercultural education has a variety of definitions because it is a concept that continues to evolve. In 1998, Cushner defined intercultural education as:. . .imply[ing] comparisons, exchanges, cooperation, and confrontation between groups. Problems and situations are seen as so complex that they can be dealt with only through the convergence and combination of different viewpoints ... intercultural education is more proactive and action oriented than multicultural education, and rather than focusing on specific problems ... [intercultural education] recognizes that a genuine understanding of cultural differences and similarities is necessary in order to build a foundation for working collaboratively with others (page 4). …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,382
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,404
Écart entre enseignants0,364 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle