MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W181201195 · doi:10.1037/e350392004-001

Parent Self-Efficacy Mediates the Impact of Family Intervention

2003· dataset· en· W181201195 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David MacPhee

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsycEXTRA Dataset · 2003
Typedataset
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCompetence (human resources)Self-efficacyPsychologyPsychological interventionDevelopmental psychologyModerationIntervention (counseling)Social psychologyClinical psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Self-appraisals are thought to play an important role in a number of youth problem behaviors. Self-perceived competence in the parental role may be an important mediator of family interventions. The purpose of the study described was to determine whether parental self-efficacy is causally related to effective child rearing. To do so, the authors analyzed data from several large-sample trials of a family intervention that focused on improving parent and child self-appraisals, among other outcomes. In both trials, parent self-efficacy increased significantly. Both punishment and coercive interactions declined. The role of self-efficacy as a mediator was examined through regression analyses. Baseline self-efficacy was not a significant predictor of changes in child rearing, but the baseline child rearing measure was. Across both trials and all outcome measures, changes in self-efficacy accounted for significant variance in improved child rearing. Thus, the intervention resulted in improved self-efficacy, and such changes explained improved parenting skills. (GCP) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the ori inal document. Parent Self-Efficacy Mediates the Impact of Family Intervention David MacPhee & Jan Miller-Heyl Colorado State University U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) O This document has been reproduced as received from the person or organization originating it. O Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality. Points of view or opinions stated in this document do not necessarily represent official OERI position or policy. PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) 1 Poster presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, August 2003 MacPhee: Department of Human Development & Family Studies, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. rnacpheecahs.colostate.edu. Miller-Heyl: DARE to be You Program, CSU Cooperative Extension, 136 Aylesworth Hall NW, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523. darecort@coop.ext.colostate.edu. This research was supported by grants from the Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. 2 BEST COPY AVAILABLE Self-appraisals are thought to play an important role in a number of youth problem behaviors (Meggert, 1996), although much of this literature is correlational. A recent metaanalysis of 116 intervention studies found that programs focused on modifying self-esteem were more effective in altering problem behaviors or academic skills, as compared to interventions without an emphasis on self-appraisals (Haney & Durlak, 1998). Yet some skeptics assert that such an emphasis is ultimately harmful because it promotes narcissism at the expense of family health (Burr & Christensen, 1992). Some of the confusion about the role of self-appraisals is conceptual: Self-esteem has less to do with selfishness than with affective judgments about one's worth whereas self-efficacy, which is the focus of our study, is a construct grounded in mastery. Self-perceived competence in the parental role may be an important mediator of family interventions: It correlates with concurrent measures of child-rearing practices (MacPhee et al., 1996), regardless of culture, and predicts changes in parenting skill (Spoth et al., 1995). Our purpose was to determine whether parent self-efficacy is causally related to effective child rearing. To do so, we analyzed data from several large-sample trials of a family intervention that focused on improving parent and child self-appraisals, among other outcomes. The initial demonstration project included 363 at-risk families who were recruited into the DARE to be You program (Miller-Heyl et al., 2001), assigned at random to intervention and control groups, and completed follow-up assessments one year later. The replication trial included 258 families who also were assigned at random and completed one-year follow-ups. Attrition was less than 10%. The two trials were implemented at sites differing in population density and ethnicity, and with different staff. The same curriculum was followed, which involved 24 hours of workshops (over 12 weeks) that included many experiential and discussionbased exercises related to self-appraisals, communication, discipline, and decision making. It is

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Jeu de données · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,028
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,043
Tête enseignante GPT0,370
Écart entre enseignants0,327 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreJeu de données

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsycEXTRA DatasetMême sujetChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentTravaux en français237 207