Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract Practitioner Driven Senior Design Capstone Course INTRODUCTION The capstone design experience in an undergraduate engineering degree program is a course in which students draw upon various aspects of their undergraduate coursework to develop a comprehensive, engineered solution to an open-ended problem. Since Autumn Quarter 2000, the capstone senior design course in the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) at University of Cincinnati (UC) is executed as a three-quarter Integrated Design Sequence (IDS) course, offered in conjunction with a practicing professional engineer (client), and other practitioners and faculty members acting as mentors. IDS is an innovative and ambitious three-course series focusing on a single design theme with multiple components that encourage interaction among traditional CEE specialty areas (e.g., construction, environmental, geotechnical, structural, transportation, water resources). Students work in design teams, like a design firm, and submit feasibility, design and construction plans, and associated cost estimates for a real-world project. Students must interface with a “client” and a group (consisting of 6 to 8 members) of “industry advisors” or practitioners (who collectively act as owners) to gather data and information; the owners are also in the audience for final presentations. A specially Design Center houses all the teams. The whole experience stresses on communication and collaborative skills. This course is designed as a gateway to the profession. The deliverable each quarter is a set of plans with a written report. For the autumn quarter, the drawings show a conceptual plan. The product of the Winter Quarter is a set of design plans with details, specifications, quantities and a construction cost estimate, and the product of the Spring Quarter is a set of design plans simplified for better understanding by a non-technical audience. This paper describes four aspects to the IDS course: 1) description of the course goals and implementation; 2) a brief description of the projects executed; 3) grading process used; and 4) assessment of the project outcomes, objectives, and results. Hopefully, this documentation will help others in planning similar experiences for senior engineering students. DESCRIPTION OF THREE-PHASE SENIOR DESIGN PROJECT Course Goals. All CEE undergraduate students at UC are required to take Integrated Design I, II, and III. These courses were installed in the curriculum to provide a final, integrated engineering experience for the students and to meet the General Education requirements of the University. The courses are spread over three quarters to allow the students sufficient time to complete a significant project. The goals of the Integrated Design courses are: 1. To show students how engineering concepts, taught as individual subjects in disparate courses, are brought together in a project. 2. To demonstrate the interaction needed between CE sub-disciplines in a project. 3. To provide training and experience on teamwork and team building, essential for modern engineering practice. 4. To improve oral, written, and visual communication skills. 5. To force students to consider non-technical aspects of a project, such as:
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,262 | 0,147 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».