Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Trierarchy was a leitorgia, which the richest citizens could be called on to perform 'public-services' for a year at Athens in the 5th and 4th centuries BC. Trierarch means 'trireme-commander' but he is not only to command the ship but also to bear the cost of the maintenance and repair. Trierarchy was probably established between the last quarter of the 6th century and 480 BC. Thanks to the discovery of the silver mines in the south of Attika(Maroneia, Laureion) in 483 BC, Athens built one hundred trirems at Themistokles' disposal. According to Themistokles' navy bill, one hundred talents was deposited with the hundred richest men of Athens who had triremes built from this money(AP. 22.7). I think that 'richest men' in this navy bill reflect two points. The one is the rising of the wealth. They came into military and political world by developing sea-trade. The other is the possibility that the richest men could be converted to trierarchs. It is indirectly verified by the distribution of belonging demes of leitourgia in 5th century BC, which was concentrated near seaside and city. The first record on trierach was inscribed on Themistokles Decree (line 18-23, ML. No.23) in 480 Be. This inscription explained how to appoint trierarch and his requisition. Trierarchy was needed land and house possession within Attica and a legitimate son. It shows trierarch's military importance. For this requsition was involved to a high-ranking politicians such as strategos(generals) who appointed trierarchs. So it is possible that the trierarchs were connected politically because most of the strategos were politicians in 5th century Be. To clear trierarchs' political relations, I compared trierarchs who acted politically and didn't. But only 3.27% (4 of 327 leitourgia) was in politics. However the case of Lykomedes who performed trierarch in 480 Be shows that they had political orientation, especially democratic will. I think that the other side of the trierarch's military obligation is the increasing power of the wealth and their ascending political status. Also it may reflect decreasing influence of traditional aristocrats.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,005 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».